By Red Pill  |  04-13-2018   News
Photo credit: ABC7

President Trump has now issued a Presidential Pardon to Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the man who revealed the identity of Valerie Plame, the Central Intelligence Agency's officer who was also a Chief of Staff to former Vice President Dick Cheney, leaving many to speculate that the President of the United States of America is sending a message to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

That speculation is meant to imply that any aides to President Trump who've been targeted as per the “witch hunt” if Mueller could also be pardoned in the future, a likely scenario in which sends the message that the President will pardon anyone who has been wrongly accused or targeted for what Mueller has created as being some type of crime.

Many Americans are furious with the most recent raid on President Trump's attorney's office, where Michael Cohen had seemingly been targeted by Mueller for instances completely unrelated to any alleged “Russian meddling” or “Russian collusion” narrative, showing that the Special Counsel is now simply grasping for straws at this point, unable to implicate anyone within the President's administration, or the President himself.

During his speech in regards to Scooter Libby, President Trump made clear that he has never met Scooter Libby, but that he's been told Libby was targeted with harassment much like many in his own Administration have been thus far.

“I don’t know Mr. Libby,” Trump said, continuing, “but for years I have heard that he has been treated unfairly. Hopefully, this full pardon will help rectify a very sad portion of his life.”

As most know, Valerie Plame was considered a prominent agent within the CIA, and at the time of her being revealed to the world, was married to Joseph Wilson, a strong critic of the Bush administration.

At the time it was suggested that Plame was revealed to the world based upon Joseph Wilson's negative statements about George W. Bush, and Scooter Libby was brought forth on charges of both perjury, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to investigators in 2005.

Thus far President Trump has rarely used his “pardon powers,” outside of commuting the sentence of Sholom Rubashkin, the Chabad-Lubavitch white-collar business owner, which makes his uncanny decision to one that's incredibly rare.

Of course, Valerie Plame took to the critique of the decision of President Trump, going onto the broadcast of MSNBC where she argued that the President is making moves to send a signal to Mueller.

“This is definitely not about me. It's absolutely not about Scooter Libby. This is about Donald Trump and his future,” Plame said. “It's very clear that this is a message he's sending that you can commit crimes against national security and you will be pardoned, so I think he's got an audience of three right now. That would be Manafort, Flynn and Kushner, and perhaps others.”

“The message being sent is you can commit perjury and I will pardon you if it protects me and I deem that you are loyal to me,” she continued.

She's not wrong, since brave and valiant patriots like General Michael Flynn have been targeted, and no doubt themselves deserve a pardon in the future, if not having their names cleared entirely.

For what it's worth, nobody in America had talked about Scooter Libby prior to this pardon for several years, and to be frank, honestly no American really cares at this point.

The Central Intelligence Agency is considered the enemy of the people, commencing to rogue actions against not only Americans but foreign governments outside of the nationalist desires of the citizens of this nation.

Many who may have once felt sorry for Plame, no longer would see a reason to protect an asset of the CIA, now that it's efforts to spy on Americans and engage in illicit activities across the globe have been fully exposed.

Additional Sources:

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/13/trump-pardon-scooter-libby-522055

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

~<b>Send Me An E-Mail!</b>

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<b><i>Follow Me On Twitter!</i></b>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillU">@IWillRedPillU</a>

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><i>Be Sure To Share Our Articles!</i></span>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><b>The Goldwater</b></span>

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
2 Comment/s


Anonymous No. 23062 1523655913

Mueller needs to be put under a microscope

mike Seibert No. 23063 1523656107

And youare worried about Scooter, really? But Peter Strzok had the insurance plan and this was it; Mueller wants to have blood on his sword, so he did Mike Flynn in; General Fynn RECEIVED bad legal advice, he should have fought it as the 'wire' Interceptions were illegal and James Comey's admission was exculpatory for Mike Fylnn. There was nothing illegal at all; 18 USC 1001 requires a deliberate intent to deceive and DOJ guidelines, require that it be related to underlying crime! Before its amendment on October 11, 1996, 18 U.S.C. § 1001 provided:

Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry . . . .provides that “whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully . . . makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry,” faces criminal liability. In other words, the statute makes it a criminal offense to render a statement that: (1) is false, (2) is material, (3) is knowingly and willfully made, and (4) concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal department or agency. United States v. Turner, 551 F.3d 657, 662 (7th Cir.2008). For a statement to be materially false, it “must have `a natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing, the decision of the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed.'” United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 509, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995) . Mike Flynn should have withdrawn his BS plea! His statement was not Materially false, his actions were lawful. This is Peter Strzok's, Rod Rosenstein, Mueller's and Lisa Page's Obama's agenda. Man, you guys need good Criminal defense attorneys;

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress that FBI agents didn't think Flynn lied

There is now no doubt Mike Flynn was set-up

ALLENWESTREPUBLIC.COM

But Peter Strzok had the insurance plan and this was it; Mueller wants to have blood on his sword, so he did Mike Flynn in; General Fynn RECEIVED bad legal advice, he should have fought it as the 'wire' Interceptions were illegal and James Comey's admission was exculpatory for Mike Fylnn. There was nothing illegal at all; 18 USC 1001 requires a deliberate intent to deceive and DOJ guidelines, require that it be related to underlying crime! Before its amendment on October 11, 1996, 18 U.S.C. § 1001 provided:

Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry . . . .provides that “whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully . . . makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry,” faces criminal liability. In other words, the statute makes it a criminal offense to render a statement that: (1) is false, (2) is material, (3) is knowingly and willfully made, and (4) concerns a matter within the jurisdiction of a federal department or agency. United States v. Turner, 551 F.3d 657, 662 (7th Cir.2008). For a statement to be materially false, it “must have `a natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing, the decision of the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed.'” United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 509, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995) . Mike Flynn should have withdrawn his BS plea! His statement was not Materially false, his actions were lawful. This is Peter Strzok's, Rod Rosenstein, Mueller's and Lisa Page's Obama's agenda. Man, you guys need good Criminal defense attorneys;

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress that FBI agents didn't think Flynn lied

There is now no doubt Mike Flynn was set-up

ALLENWESTREPUBLIC.COM

What do you think about this article?
Name
Comment *
Image