By: Red Pill | 09-11-2017 | News
Photo credit: The Goldwater

16 Years After September 11th: WTC7 Collapse Cover-Up

16 Years After September 11th : WTC7 Collapse Cover-Up

September 11th, 2001. The day America lost her Liberty forever, and the entire world began to change into a globalist warmongering reign of violent incursions that would trample upon individual freedoms in ways never before thought possible.

You could say it's the day the New World Order came to power, in the sense that the world has still not recovered from the downward spiral of repetition and continues to reenact the same mistakes (or intentional actions) that put the individual rights of citizens second to globalist measures under the guise of security.

Make no mistake, September 11th was the single most catastrophic major event in American and possibly world history.

<div id="pdf1"></div>

<script>PDFObject.embed("6fa7e90a750a3e1168c06d859369896b1ee377ca314a251c9c6d7db3f87462d8.pdf", "#pdf1");</script>

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/T0kKAivy7t0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

The official 9/11 report however doesn't tend to mention the World Trade Center Solomon Building at all, something that many felt was absolutely imperative to suggesting there was some sort of cover-up.

Of course everyone remembers that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 around 20 minutes before it actually toppled.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ltP2t9nq9fI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Not to mention the building itself when it did collapse was never hit by a plane. It seems to crash just as if it were a controlled demolition.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Zv7BImVvEyk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

15 minutes after the first Twin Tower's collapse, CBS camera-man runs into the building 7's lobby. The alarm sound here is distinctly different from alarms of fire-engines and ambulances heard outside.

It's possible it was the WTC nuclear demolition alarm. A "certain" alarm system existed in the WTC-7 and transmitted "certain" signals towards the rest of the WTC complex.

The transmission of it was turned off at 6:47 AM September 11th of 2001, and this was due to last 8 hours. (Source: NIST, "Interim Findings And Accomplishments", in Progress Report on the Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center, Vol.1.,28.).

The CBS reporter then encounters a certain Mr. Bennette who wears a VRU hood (the VRU hood is intended as a means of breath protection against bio- and chemical- hazards and could be as well used for protection against radioactive dust and radioactive vapor).

Mr. Bennette in a remarkably calm and composed manner (considering the unprecedented collapse of the South Tower only 15 minutes ago that supposed to horrify everyone, servicemen inclusive) urges the man to leave and says that everyone has already gone from the building 7 and only he remained there to control that nobody goes "downstairs" (since he urges the CBS man to leave the WTC-7 and the way to leave it is apparently downstairs, it should be presumed that by saying "that nobody goes downstairs".

Mr. Bennette obviously means some underground premises, not simply the way down out of the WTC-7 lobby). Mr. Bennette refuses to elaborate, but tells the CBS reporter his surname and admits to be from the Secret Service.

The most incriminating thing, however, is that in his left hand Mr. Bennette holds a typical construction helmet, which is a highly unusual thing to be worn by the Secret Service personnel (especially considering that the supposedly "unexpected" collapse of the South Tower has occurred only 15 minutes ago, while the collapse of the North Tower was yet to happen).

The Secret Service folks could, perhaps, wear steel combat helmets, in a certain situation, but not the plastic contraction helmets. The plastic construction helmets are typically worn only by construction workers (Mr. Bennette is apparently not the one) and by… demolition men (perhaps, in this particular case also by nuclear demolition men).

Judging by elementary logic, it should be presumed Mr. Bennette was also a part of the WTC demolition team, considering the fact that he was issued the construction helmet (do you know that members of demolition teams typically wear construction helmets?)

You can read more about the OST here:

http://nnsa.energy.gov/aboutus/ourprograms/defenseprograms/securetransportation

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LbkQddEDPs0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

There has long since been theories about what may have actually happened to World Trade Center Building 7, and what actually was inside of the building that may have needed to be eliminated.

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/cd66323e3dadea2a059d50110e1136486ce68ac0449c3723f07598510a0906ff.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

Then let's remind those reading that contrary to the government's alleged final findings years after the initial 9/11 Report, which had no mention of the World Trade Center Building 7, that it was suggested by experts that such a free fall simply wasn't possible.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_nyogTsrsgI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Keep in mind it was also caught on camera that something was being carted away, possibly gold bullion from within World Trade Center 7 before it's “collapse”.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4W2vbu_UeeY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Later during his Presidential run, then Senator John Kerry also agreed during a town hall style forum that he was told that World Trade Center Building 7 was pulled down in a “controlled fashion”.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jbReTl3Uin0E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Most don't realize, World Trade Center Building 7 didn't “collapse” until 5:20 PM later in the day on September 11th of 2001, and the leaseholder, Larry Silverstein, Later admitted himself during an interview that the building was “pulled”.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/p34XrI2Fm6I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Why is this not talked about, and why would the government continue to teach lies and cover this up?

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/13AEvQrjsFs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/0386e2d4c9cef85ec1a0d11a5425ee440d7179e4a01e03aa5366ba006568b140.jpg" style="max-height:640px;max-width:360px;">

There are several theories, including those of Dr. Judy Wood which tends to bring the shills out in full force at even mentioning her name.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vadSaWyiozg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

Holograms? No planes? Remote controls?

These are all dead ends, make you sound crazy, and will likely never be solved. Don't waste your time on these details.

What you should spend your time researching and raising awareness on is FOLLOWING THE MONEY

Forget for one moment everything you've been told about September 11th of 2001.

9/11 was a crime, and as with any crime, there is one overriding imperative that detectives must follow to identify the perpetrators: follow the money. This is an investigation of the 9/11 money trail.

<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/n3xgjxJwedA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>

The fact of the matter remains, we still don't have the truth. The testimonies of those present have been given, on several occasions, and the government of the United States of America continues to contradict those claims of witnesses and video evidence.

Here we are, September 11th of 2017, and still have more unanswered questions than we do answers.

What have Americans lost? Liberties, freedoms, thousands of lives in Middle Eastern wars, trillions of dollars.

What have Americans gained? A nanny state, increased censorship from government, tougher rules and regulations on travel, the largest debt and deficit in American history.

In closing, you decide what to believe. It's not for me to end up in a shallow grave for suggesting anything. The facts and opinions are there, and you must come to a logical conclusion as to just who, or what happened on that fateful day.

The truth will set us free. Never forget those who died, and always pray for their families.

Source:

https://8ch.net/pol/res/10584132.html

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<i>On Twitter:</i>

<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>

Tips? Info? Send me a message!

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
8 Comment/s
Anonymous No. 7919 2017-09-11 : 11:24

Israel Did 9/11 as a joint Mossad /CIA Operation to invoke war for profit in the Middle East

Anonymous No. 7920 2017-09-11 : 11:29

>>7919

Where are your sources for such an outrageous claim?

Anonymous No. 7933 2017-09-11 : 18:11

Stupid tinfoil hat conspiracy. WTC7 was a controlled demolition, so that it didn't just fall at random. The building was evacuated, and brought down in a controlled fashion in order to prevent it from falling without warning. The building was mortally wounded, and was un-salvageable. Put your retarded "facts" back up your asses where you got them.

Real World No. 7936 2017-09-11 : 19:39

If in fact it was controlled demolition, then imagine the time that would be needed to run the explosives. A building(WTC7) that size takes around 2 weeks minimum if you have a large team of skilled workers busting their ass making a ton of overtime.

Just this alone should raise red flags for any cognizant human.

Anonymous No. 7981 2017-09-12 : 14:46

In talking with several friends I feel there is WAY more to this story that even you guys have brought up. Some VERY knowledgeable persons I have known for YEARS told me within DAYS of 9/11 the Building 7 collapse was for SECURITY purposes ONLY. I know the jobs and titles of these persons and trust THEM with my life, Do I trust our government leaders? Not nearly that much!

K Yochum No. 7982 2017-09-12 : 15:19

In talking with several friends I feel there is WAY more to this story that even you guys have brought up. Some VERY knowledgeable persons I have known for YEARS told me within DAYS of 9/11 the Building 7 collapse was for SECURITY purposes ONLY. I know the jobs and titles of these persons and trust THEM with my life, Do I trust our government leaders? Not nearly that much!

Anonymous No. 8034 2017-09-13 : 13:09

OK, according to the US Gov itself .

The NIST Findings.

=============

"There is one basic reason for the WTC-7 collapse. Its design. "The columns in the WTC-7 held "exceptionally heavy loads". Quoting a comment by NIST Structural Eng Dr. Shyam Sunder on the WTC-7 failure.

" If you take out just 1 column on one of the lower floors, it could cause a progressive vertical collapse so that entire section comes down.

So BOTH arguments of delayed collapse and controlled demolition hold weight.

A QUICK "controlled demolition" would have been possible since only 1 column needed to be taken out.

To pull this off would only have required a few 100 ft of det cord setup be wrapped around 1 or 2 columns and surrounded by a blast blanket.

A DELAYED 9-11 COLLAPSE

is also feasible, given all the emergency debris removal and heavy equipment being used in the close proximity of WTC-7.

https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2017/05/09/Media_Public_Briefing_H_062305_sunder.pdf

Anonymous No. 8156 2017-09-15 : 20:38

WTC7 had a major design design issue ,which numerous engineers have said only required 1 column to fail. A controlled demo prep could have been done in 1 day. Also a delayed failure is also just as likekly. So flip a coin.

What do you think about this article?
Name
Comment *
Image

Recent News

Popular Stories