How surprising, the ultra-liberal SJW YouTube personality Stephen Bonnell, better known as "Destiny" is apparently under investigation by the FBI for possession of child pornography. I'm being sarcastic of course seeing as Destiny has been open about the fact that he advocates for legalizing incest and "ethical child porn." Wait, what? Ok. let's rewind a bit first.
Destiny, the self-same self-righteous "voice of Social Justice" who has attacked and doxed other YouTubers for veering away from the Cultural Marxist path released nudes of an ex-girlfriend in 2012. To retaliate, she, in turn, hacked his Gmail account releasing nude photos of him as well as leaked group chat logs in which Bonnell admits to having taken pictures from a 15-year-old girl who wanted to "hook up" and how it was "so hard" to turn her down. In the group chat, his friends seem to sympathize with him as they minimize the act of child exploitation:
<quote>"who tf cares it's not like you're 40 years old"</quote>
Well, evidently (and thankfully) the FBI tf cares. Another member of the group chat (who may also be worth at least adding as a person of interest in Destiny's case) but that he shouldn't go any further than photographing her as young people "are usually so inexperienced." And yes, <a href="https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=641_1512179884">the issue of "ethical child porn"</a> evidently the tangible documents of child exploitation and child molestation should be available because of the "moral and pragmatic value" in that it will stop pedophiles from abusing children.
<a href="https://archive.is/ssxNx">In the leaked chat logs</a>, Destiny's friends discuss the pros and cons of having sex with "hot" underage girls. At one point, one of Destiny's inner circle asks for the pictures of the underage girl and Bonnell willingly obliges.
1:18:44 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: pics plz
[1:18:50 PM] Payam Toghyan: fayth likes the preteens
[1:18:50 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: but what happened then
[1:18:51 PM] * Steven Bonnell II sent 0235.jpg TIYLP .jpg *
At least it seems like he knows what he was getting into:
[1:18:53 PM] Steven Bonnell II: girl on the left
[1:19:07 PM] Steven Bonnell II: so hard to say no
[1:19:11 PM] Steven Bonnell II: gonna get arrested one of these MLGs man
[1:19:18 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: wow lolol
[1:19:24 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: funny how girls
[1:19:26 PM] Payam Toghyan: wtf who cares its not like ur 40 years old
[1:19:27 PM] Josue "Fayth" Sauvageau: responds to fame
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Destiny, known distributor of child pornography, known predator and incestuous threat to all ages, is now walking back his claim that he ever received nudes from underage girls despite the prior admissions and evidence.</p>— JD huWhite (@TheKeksplainer) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheKeksplainer/status/947242848864342018?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of "Dick Pic" <a href="https://twitter.com/OmniDestiny?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@OmniDestiny</a> goons mentioned: "I am on the side of destiny on the cp argument, consuming child pornography is not a violation of the NAP and if it helps the to reduce children being raped, it's a good thing." <a href="https://twitter.com/JFGariepy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JFGariepy</a> plz respond <a href="https://t.co/dhb6hOhfbA">https://t.co/dhb6hOhfbA</a>"</p>— Narses Kalchas (@NarsesKalchas) <a href="https://twitter.com/NarsesKalchas/status/947208903728779269?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Destiny & co (I know, I know you're thinking "what, THIS standup crew?) were also <a href="http://archive.is/hREJU">apparently grooming a preteen</a> through IRC chat just a few months ago. Evidently (surely not, you're screaming at this point as you've left the edge of your seat and are standing and jumping up and down on it like Tom Cruise on the Oprah show announcing his imminent "marriage" to Katie Holmes) this is <a href="http://archive.is/fa05z">nothing near an isolated incident</a> from the Social Justice loving crew of Destiny groupies as witnessed at the official Destiny subreddit.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HMgsQSwkqO4" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Are you talking about this video? <a href="https://t.co/5SCrxIx8CE">https://t.co/5SCrxIx8CE</a><br>How in the fuck was this an ambush? <a href="https://twitter.com/BrittanyVenti?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BrittanyVenti</a> was taunting him the entire time about the topic and when he challengedher shelost hershit. She had2other people agreeing with her, then <a href="https://twitter.com/Asmongold?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Asmongold</a> tried reasoning to her</p>— Vex (@Vexed_Reprobate) <a href="https://twitter.com/Vexed_Reprobate/status/947317861495787521?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 31, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The guy who argued "if birth control is used what's really wrong with incest?" and besides "it takes several generations of incest" before there is any risk of serious birth defects. Oh, don't forget being opposed to incest due to the risk of birth defects makes you "pro-eugenics." This is the same guy who argued for bestiality because "if the animal isn't hurt, what's wrong with it?" This is the same guy who takes offense to Lauren Southern's issues on immigration. We don't have to go deeply into the issue of moral relativism, but I'm sure most sane persons, even those who are pro-open borders might agree that incest, animal and child abuse are probably not as big an issue as to whether or not we open the floodgates as far as immigration goes.
Of course, even with all this, there are plenty of his hardcore fans (many of whom are likely hardcore incest, child and bestiality porn fans) who are going to bat for him.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"Under investigation" = "guilty" now<br>I guess its strange how you feel this way about someone you don't like, Destiny… But when its Trump under investigation, he is surely innocent </p>— LTBALOL (@LTBALOL) <a href="https://twitter.com/LTBALOL/status/977154566893527041?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
But this fanboyish protective behavior has been going on for a while:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">And even if these two things are true. The amount of ways that these people lie and misrepresent Destiny on a daily basis is insane. They lie about him being a pedophile and whole cloth supporting child pornography when these things are not true in the slightest.</p>— zemiron (@zemiron) <a href="https://twitter.com/zemiron/status/957238648600190976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Wait, did you watch the video above where he literally argues in favor of the "moral and pragmatic" foundation for supporting "ethical child pornography?" No one is putting words in his mouth, no one even had to hand him the rope needed to hang himself. And here's the thing, the incest and child porn advocacy aren't one-off things, no evidently they're as common as… well, Destiny groupies grooming underage girls.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/JFGariepy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JFGariepy</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BravingRuin?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BravingRuin</a> Destiny and his little gang were involved in grooming a 12 year old in their twitch chat <a href="https://t.co/eV1SrhZn8E">pic.twitter.com/eV1SrhZn8E</a></p>— Alexei (@MSalutant) <a href="https://twitter.com/MSalutant/status/947171299025211392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
By the way, that argument that Destiny makes in favor of child pornography involving real children being used as a "deterrent" to more child exploitation, molestation and rape? Yeah, the authors themselves are very clear when they say, "We do not approve of the use of real children in the production and distribution of child pornography."
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I read the paper Destiny likes citing to support his argument for “ethical child porn” involving real kids to lower related sex crimes.<br><br>It’s just statistical correlations between the # of sex crime reports and the availability of porn. <br><br>Here’s what the authors themselves say. <a href="https://t.co/siaPsMo2QT">pic.twitter.com/siaPsMo2QT</a></p>— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) <a href="https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/954545170673893376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 20, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The Destiny groupies aren't all naifs though. Some, as we've seen, seems to fully support the idea of making incest and child exploitation mainstream. There's this Twitter user who is constantly fighting for Destiny's honor and advocating for socialism when he's not pointing out that the only argument you can come up with against child pornography is a moral one, which… uhhh, isn't that enough?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">why? The only real argument against child pornography is a moral one, which is what Destiny was espousing throughout the debate.</p>— Vex (@Vexed_Reprobate) <a href="https://twitter.com/Vexed_Reprobate/status/936986187344023553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Here's another who equates the protracted baiting and grooming of a preteen girl with a veritable civil rights struggle:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Oh no! Not a conversation!!!<br>What's next? Are we going to be conversing with gays? Blacks? OH THE HUMANITY!!! </p>— Rocky Avalon (@RockyAvalon) <a href="https://twitter.com/RockyAvalon/status/947210826246770689?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Sadly, this isn't surprising considering NAMBLA and other pedophilia advocates try and argue that the "right" to molest children is actually important in order to "liberate" children from the oppressive morality of their parents and the "outdated morality" we're all saddled with due to generations of those horrible "dead, white guys" and their vicious, repressive patriarchy. Seriously though, if patriarchy is the side that supports not distributing the evidence of the rape of a child, I guess I'm all for it.
It's pretty bad when doxing, false DMCA claims and revenge porn are the least offensive charges.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Omnidestiny issues a copyright takedown of a twitter video stream clip <a href="https://twitter.com/BrittanyVenti?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BrittanyVenti</a> posted. <a href="https://t.co/qohF6HDyyD">pic.twitter.com/qohF6HDyyD</a></p>— Nick Monroe (@nickmon1112) <a href="https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/936779515543425025?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<iframe width="1280" height="720" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pEKP2c2-ZA0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
He's even admitted he was "so close" to planning the murder of a guy he disagreed with (and his family) having had streets mapped out, getting a permit to own a gun and even talked to friends who were willing to help him. And get this, the only thing that stopped him? The fact that he was "making so much money on Twitch." Wow, real class act there Mr. Bonnell. Way to go, you champion for what is right, you posterboy for "social justice."
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"> <a href="https://t.co/aPG9eWbjKr">pic.twitter.com/aPG9eWbjKr</a></p>— Laudanum (@FaustianBurgle) <a href="https://twitter.com/FaustianBurgle/status/947218434298925056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Honestly, it's probably all for the best and hopefully when the case is brought forth his child (yes, the man argues in favor of incest and believes taking pictures of underage kids and fapping to child porn can be totally morally justified has a child himself) will find a safe home. We'll be following this one as it develops, who knows, maybe it will culminate in Stephen "ethical child porn" Bonnell learning the value of rehabilitation in the form "moral and pragmatic prison rape."
[UPDATE]
We are in contact with Stephen Bonnell who has taken offense at this article which he considers "slanderous." According to Bonnell:
<blockquote>some of the information in there is just wrong (I've never "leaked nudes" of anyone and I don't "dox YouTubers") and a ton of it is horrendously spun half-truths, ie: the video posted about incest/beastiality was literally a devil's advocate argument against another guy who rang in to debate something, etc etc etc</blockquote>
We will be setting up a time to speak with Mr. Bonnell and get the story set straight from the horse's mouth. Here at The Goldwater, we always aim to offer nothing but factual and accurate information, even in our Op-Eds section. Speaking of Op-Eds, all Opinions are solely the opinions of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Goldwater or the whole of its staff. That's one thing that is great about The Goldwater, we have a very diverse group of writers many of whom have strong opinions but we certainly never aim to be either misleading nor an echo chamber.
-Ed.
Very disappointed in the misleading information in this hit piece. But if it comes out that fbi investigation isnt fake news and is found guilty, then he can go get fucked.
Destiny? Ultra Left? You do know who you're talking about right? He's honestly not that far to the left, unless you have only two brain cells in your little smooth brain.
Not fake news.
Check the link below. He said it himself. If it's a hit piece, sorry, he really DID admit he got a permit, bought a gun and tracked down the address of a teenage boy and was planning to murder him and his family (with the help of friends which makes it conspiracy). He really did admit on Kumite that he has had LOTS of underage girls after him and that "normies" just don't understand that it's just like that when you're an esports megastar. He really did admit that the FBI knocked on his door and asked to see his hard drive. I doubt they would have tipped him off if they didn't have some evidence.
Believe what you like but it's true. Is it still considered a hit piece when all the "smear" is true?
Sadly, you're possibly right. Ted Gunderson said that the FBI was harboring pedos in his time and if you check out the Finders Cult you'll find the CIA protected some child rapist/programmers as well.
>>21313 YEE boiiiii!
Only "ultra-progressive" publications like Salon come out in favor of pedophilia and incnest bro. Sorry, saying child porn can be "morally pragmatic" is NOT a centrist opinion. He has said if you are opposed to incest then you're "pro-eugenics" basically painting his opponents as Nazis if they don't think parents should have sex with their children. These are NOT centrist opinions.
Thank you, was just about to share this myself. For good measure I WILL share it again.
This guy is sick!
Destiny isn't under FBI investigation, I bet you'll write a fair article about how wrong you are now right? https://www.facebook.com/OmniDestiny/posts/1588001671298149
"They were just cordial conversations following up with tips they'd received online."
Cordial visits where they're there to drag your computer away. They will be back with a warrant soon. This is a common dirty tactic used to make the pedophile panic and attempt to delete evidence, digging themselves deeper.
>News site that gets info from Twitter
>The FBI wouldn't seize your electronics if they thought you had CP
If you take this article seriously, you're a retard.
How can you even call yourself a journalist writing this shit.
I can't believe I used to read anything from this website, the bias is UNREAL.
Nice hit piece. The writer of this should probably be fired. Trying to dive into something this complicated while barely having a superficial understanding of the situation is embarrassing. Its sad that doing even a little bit of deeper researcher is so hard for inept writers like this.
" Here at The Goldwater, we always aim to offer nothing but factual and accurate information, "
Writes a hit piece that only tells one side, which is the side of the centrist/skeptics that constantly spread misinformation about Steven.
Hilarious.
I want to report, but I believe the boss of The Goldwater doesnt care
I read the article and I'm looking at what's claimed and uhhhh, it DOES look like the dude is saying child porn should be legal, that bestiality and incest is ok and that if you don't like incest you're for eugenics lol? So, what's the other side? No, seriously. How is it a hit piece if it's true?
Wait i thought he said he'd only make it legal if it was proven that using it in a clinical setting as a treatment tool for pedos. And i thought his argument was that if it helped to reduce the overall child abuse that it would be a good thing. And wasn't him bringing up this argument only a small part (~5mim) of a debate he had where he was arguing against someone that wanted to abolish age of consent laws? And didn't he say that if 1)an ethics committee said no or 2)if it didn't turn out to help reduce the amount of child abuse that he would stop it.
As for the incest and beastiality stuff. I'm pretty sure that he's said that he's against these things since you can know for certain if the person/animal can actually give consent for these types of things.
Idk my dude it seems like a hit piece tbh. That or the journalist is pretty dumb.
yeh but, the researchers themselves made it CLEAR that "real children" should not be used to create child porn for treatment or otherwise. did you read the article? just scroll up, that is totally mentioned in the thing. so eyah, sounds like it was destiny who didn't fully read the research, i mean, according to this article but oh wait, yeah, there's a screencap of the research itself where the researchers themselves do say they do NOT approve of the distribution of child porn with children. they're talkingb about using realistic animation, etc.
as for the "moral and pragmatic value" (stolen from kiwi farms)
<blockquote>Let's tackle this from a couple perspectives:
-Kantian "moral imperative" theory: If no man consumed child porn, child porn would not be produced. The production of child pornography is a moral wrong. Therefore, consuming child pornography is a moral wrong by extension.
-Utilitarianism: the temporary pleasure gained by the consumers of child pornography is not outweighed by the lasting psychological and physical damage caused to the child. Therefore, child pornography is a moral wrong.
-Libertarianism: Any activity that does not involve the meaningful consent of all parties is morally wrong. Children cannot meaningfully consent to sex or the production of pornographic content. Therefore, CP is morally wrong</blockquote>
also, giving child porn to pedophiles? why not just treat them in a way that doesn't have them "give in" to their desires. building up a response against getting aroused every time you see kids is probably better, i'd think. i mean, think pavlov my dude. you got a pedo who spends all day whacking to child porn, every time he goes to the grocery store and sees a kid it reminds him of the cp he whacks it to all day.
>also, giving child porn to pedophiles? why not just treat them in a way that doesn't have them "give in" to their desires.
chemical castration ftw
thought he said they would use CP that was already made in order to treat them? and didn't he say him self that if it was proven that it wouldn't work or if the researchers said not to do it then he wouldn't do it? again he this was only a small part(~5min) of his argument against abolishing the age of consent laws. he only brought it up because Yee asked him when he would be in favor of CP. Doesn't mean he want's to create more. just that he would use what was already out their to possibly prevent anymore. and again if the researchers said not to then he wouldn't do it. Also I'm pretty sure Destiny admitted him self that he only heard about the article and that he couldn't remember what it exactly said.
I mean this would probably be used in a clinical setting so he wouldn't just be given it and sent on his way. it would probably be in conjunction with actual therapy.
even still at worst he just forgot what the article actually said and was wrong. still doesn't mean he want's it legal.
also I don't think it would be legal for everyone to use/make. it would still be illegal to use out side of therapy/clinical setting and definitely illegal to make.
I think the only way to do this is by using animated porn. spend money to create stuff like this [NSFW]https://gfycat.com/SpotlessGargantuanBellfrog [NSFW]. Remove the cattail and make her what ever one digit age required.
But then we are assuming it actual works. to me it still sounds like fucking encouragement. But that is just my gut feeling.
God I hate complete fabrications. Clearly didn't process what he said or what his stance is. He doesn't advocate CP literally.... he debates MORALITY. Things have to be black or white for you dumb asses...incapable of perceiving nuance or hitting level 60 without paying for a boost.
God I hate complete fabrications. Clearly didn't process what he said or what his stance is. He doesn't advocate CP literally.... he debates MORALITY. Things have to be black or white for you dumb asses...incapable of perceiving nuance or hitting level 60 without paying for a boost.
fake news