Tesla finds itself under siege—not just from market volatility, as warned by analysts, but from a disturbing wave of physical and digital attacks that suggest a concerted political effort. Mobs of self-proclaimed leftist activists, armed with Molotov cocktails, spray paint, and ideological fervor, have targeted Tesla dealerships, charging stations, and vehicles across the United States and Europe. Simultaneously, prominent YouTubers like JerryRigEverything and Mark Rober are releasing videos that critics argue are misleading attempts to tarnish Tesla’s reputation, particularly its Cybertruck. Is this a spontaneous outcry, or evidence of a deeper, orchestrated campaign involving political motives and shadowy influences? Let’s unpack the evidence and consider the unsettling possibilities.
The Physical Onslaught: A Pattern of Political Violence
Reports from recent weeks paint a grim picture. Tesla facilities in Colorado, Massachusetts, Maryland, and New York have been hit with arson, gunfire, and vandalism, often accompanied by graffiti labeling the company as “Nazi” or tied to Elon Musk’s political alignment with President Donald Trump. In France, a dozen Cybertrucks were torched in a suspected arson attack near Toulouse, while in the U.S., protests under the banner “Tesla Takedown” have led to arrests and property damage. Trump himself has labeled these acts domestic terrorism, a stance echoed by some political figures calling for investigations into potential funding from Democratic-aligned groups.
The timing is striking. Since Musk’s elevated role in the Trump administration following the January 2025 inauguration, the backlash has intensified. Musk’s support for far-right parties in Europe and his inflammatory rhetoric—such as his January comments ahead of Holocaust Remembrance Day—have fueled outrage among leftist factions. Yet, the coordinated nature of these attacks, spanning multiple continents and involving similar tactics (arson, vandalism, protests), raises questions. Are these mobs of “leftist lunatics” acting independently, or are they being directed by darker forces with a political agenda? The sudden shift from celebrating Tesla as a green innovator to vilifying it suggests the fight may be less about environmentalism and more about power.
Digital Sabotage: YouTube’s Misleading Campaigns
Parallel to the physical attacks, Tesla faces a digital assault from YouTube influencers, with JerryRigEverything and Mark Rober at the forefront. JerryRigEverything’s recent video subjected a Cybertruck to extreme towing tests, claiming it struggled under an 11,000-pound load in sub-freezing conditions, hinting at structural weaknesses. Critics argue the test was exaggerated—using harsh conditions and ignoring Tesla’s official range ratings—designed to cast doubt on the vehicle’s durability for clicks rather than scientific rigor.
Mark Rober’s latest video, “Can You Fool a Self-Driving Car?”, has sparked even greater controversy. Promising a comparison of Tesla’s Autopilot with Luminar’s LiDAR technology, Rober instead tested only Autopilot—a basic cruise control system—while misleadingly implying it represented Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) capabilities. The video, which garnered 9 million views in 24 hours, features Luminar branding prominently, leading to accusations of it being a covert ad for the struggling LiDAR company, whose stock has plummeted 96% over five years. Raw footage discrepancies—showing Autopilot disengaging 17 frames before a staged wall collision, with altered engagement speeds—further fuel claims of manipulation. Rober’s silence on potential sponsorships and his dismissal of FSD’s superior tech have drawn ire, with fans canceling his Crunch Labs subscriptions and calling for legal action under the Lanham Act for false advertising.
Both videos share a pattern: they target Tesla’s flagship products (Cybertruck and Autopilot/FSD) with tests critics deem unrealistic or biased, amplifying negative narratives at a time when the company faces physical threats. Coincidence? Or a calculated effort to undermine Tesla’s market position and Musk’s influence?
A Concerted Political Effort?
The convergence of physical vandalism and digital misinformation suggests more than random activism. Tesla’s rise under Musk—now a political figure—threatens established interests, including traditional automakers, fossil fuel industries, and political rivals. The left’s historical embrace of EVs has soured as Musk’s Trump alignment clashes with their ideology, turning Tesla into a scapegoat. Could this be a proxy war, with leftist mobs and YouTube influencers serving as pawns in a broader struggle?
Evidence of coordination is circumstantial but compelling. The synchronized “Tesla Takedown” protests across 60+ cities, the targeting of specific assets (dealerships, Cybertrucks, Superchargers), and the sudden pivot of influencers like Rober and JerryRigEverything—both with large followings and potential corporate ties—hint at a orchestrated campaign. Posts on X reflect growing sentiment that Democratic-aligned groups or NGOs might be funding these efforts, though such claims remain unproven and should be treated with skepticism until verified. The establishment narrative of spontaneous protest clashes with the precision and scale of these attacks, suggesting darker forces—perhaps political operatives or corporate rivals—could be pulling strings.
Darker Forces at Play?
Beyond politics, the involvement of struggling tech firms like Luminar raises questions of financial motives. Luminar’s promotion in Rober’s video could indicate a desperate bid to regain relevance, possibly backed by investors with stakes in discrediting Tesla’s camera-based autonomy. Similarly, JerryRigEverything’s towing test might serve competitors in the EV or towing market, eager to exploit Tesla’s vulnerabilities. The convergence of these efforts with physical attacks could signal a multi-front strategy to destabilize Tesla, leveraging public discontent and digital platforms to amplify the damage.
Musk’s polarizing persona—genius to some, villain to others—makes him a lightning rod, but the intensity of the backlash suggests more than personal animosity. Could this be a test case for silencing influential figures who challenge the status quo? The lack of clear leadership in the protests and the reluctance of authorities to identify masterminds fuel speculation of hidden agendas, possibly involving state or corporate actors with resources to coordinate such a campaign.
Conclusion: A Call for Vigilance
The attacks on Tesla—physical and digital—appear to transcend mere activism, pointing to a concerted political effort with potential darker forces at play. While the establishment may frame this as grassroots outrage over Musk’s politics, the scale, timing, and alignment with misleading YouTube content suggest a more sinister orchestration. Investors, Tesla supporters, and the public should remain vigilant, demanding transparency from influencers like Rober and JerryRigEverything, and pressing for investigations into the funding and coordination of these attacks. Until the truth emerges, Tesla’s resilience will be tested—not just by market risks, but by a shadowy war that threatens innovation itself.
If you find value in this censorship-proof, ad-free public service, consider helping:
Bitcoin address: bc1qq7tnet6ys0dkvl336v8d0prqnmvk9zzj2dxpqe
Join Dee Stevens and Orlando on The Ship Show!
Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
0 comment/s
