Were NATO Cables in the Baltic Sea Deliberately Severed by Russia and China to Delay Escalation?

In a move that has sent shockwaves through international circles, two critical undersea communication cables in the Baltic Sea—vital lifelines for NATO's military coordination—have been severed in what appears to be a deliberate act. Given the current state of political affairs, we must assume this was an intentional effort to disrupt NATO's strategic capabilities. It is imperative that we investigate whether the stern of the Chinese bulk carrier Yi Peng 3 had any modifications that could have facilitated this act. If China does not provide full transparency, we must consider taking an aggressive posture to safeguard global security.

A Timeline of Concern

November 16, 2024: The U.S. administration authorizes Ukraine to employ long-range ATACMS missiles against Russian targets, marking a significant escalation in involvement.

November 17, 2024: The first undersea cable, the BCS East-West Interlink connecting Lithuania and Sweden, is severed.

November 18, 2024: The C-Lion1 cable, linking Finland and Germany, is also cut.

The close succession of these events suggests a coordinated effort to disrupt NATO's communication capabilities at a critical juncture.

The Chinese bulk carrier Yi Peng 3 has emerged as a vessel of interest. Anchored in international waters near both cable cut sites, the ship's position raises suspicions. Investigators are probing whether the ship's stern was modified to carry out such an operation, possibly using a multi-ton anchor or specialized equipment to sever the cables.

Despite urgent requests from Swedish authorities, the Yi Peng 3 remains anchored, and China has not permitted any inspections or boarding of the vessel. This lack of transparency necessitates a firm and decisive response to uncover the truth behind these incidents.

The severing of the C-Lion1 and BCS East-West Interlink cables has forced NATO to rely on slower, less secure backup systems like satellite communications. These cables are not just civilian infrastructures; they are the backbone of NATO's real-time military coordination among Nordic and Baltic allies. The disruption has several strategic implications:

NATO's ability to coordinate long-range strikes and joint operations has been significantly hampered. Repairing these cables is estimated to take 6–8 weeks, creating a critical window where NATO's response capabilities are diminished.

Given the potential involvement of state actors in this act of sabotage, it is crucial to conduct a thorough investigation. Examining the Yi Peng 3 for any modifications to its stern or equipment that could sever undersea cables is a necessary step. If China continues to withhold cooperation, we must consider escalating our response to ensure the security of essential communication networks.

The deliberate severing of undersea cables essential to NATO's operations cannot be taken lightly. In the face of potential coordinated actions by Russia and China, it is imperative that we respond with urgency and determination. Transparency from all parties involved is non-negotiable. Should China remain uncooperative, adopting a more aggressive posture may be necessary to protect international security and prevent further destabilization.



If you'd like to help support this censorship-proof public service, consider donating:
Bitcoin address: bc1qq7tnet6ys0dkvl336v8d0prqnmvk9zzj2dxpqe
Join Jim Watkins, Dee Stevens and Orlando on The Ship Show!
More great sources

What do you think about this article?

Name
Comment *
Image