DOGE Refund: Government Waste and the Dangers of Arbitrary Handouts

Elon Musk’s suggestion of a “DOGE refund” might sound like a populist victory, but at its core, it represents the very kind of policy that led to America’s economic woes in the first place. The proposal—to send out refund checks to taxpayers using money saved through government efficiency efforts—essentially boils down to another round of arbitrary handouts that reek of socialism. The irony is rich: attempting to fix reckless spending by redistributing money back to citizens in a manner that mirrors the fiscal irresponsibility of previous administrations.

The Slippery Slope of Government Redistribution

James Fishback, CEO of investment firm Azoria and an outside advisor to DOGE, proposed that 20% of the savings from the Deficit Optimization and Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative be refunded to taxpayers in the form of checks. His reasoning? The money belonged to the taxpayers in the first place. While this sentiment appeals to conservatives and libertarians who abhor government waste, it ignores the economic reality that redistributing funds without strategic reinvestment does little to secure long-term prosperity.

The numbers sound appealing: a $5,000 check per household based on estimated DOGE savings of $2 trillion. However, such a policy bears an uncomfortable resemblance to the stimulus checks of 2020 and 2021, which, rather than reviving the economy, contributed to rampant inflation and a workforce increasingly reliant on government aid. If the United States learned anything from that period, it should be that massive infusions of cash into the economy only create artificial booms, followed by inevitable busts.

The Root of the Problem: Out-of-Control Spending

The real conversation should be about cutting the federal government down to size. President Trump’s press conference highlighted some of the most absurd allocations of taxpayer money—millions of dollars funneled into foreign projects that do nothing to benefit hard-working Americans. The problem isn’t just waste; it’s the fundamental structure of a government that has grown too large, too intrusive, and too detached from fiscal responsibility.

President Trump’s DOGE initiative was meant to root out inefficiencies and shrink the bloated bureaucracy, not create a new avenue for wealth redistribution. Musk himself has pointed out the dangers of an entrenched bureaucratic state that operates with little accountability, warning that if unchecked, it undermines the will of the people and turns democracy into bureaucratic rule. If that’s the case, why embrace a refund system that does nothing to solve the bigger issue?

A Better Use for DOGE Savings

Rather than funneling these savings back to individuals in a one-time payout, the funds should be used for strategic reinvestment. Some options include:

1. National Debt Reduction: With the national debt sitting at unsustainable levels, using the savings to pay it down would provide long-term relief rather than a temporary boner.
2. Tax Reform: Instead of issuing checks, why not push for permanent tax cuts? Lowering the overall tax burden incentivizes economic growth and job creation.
3. Infrastructure and Innovation: Investing in American infrastructure, technological advancements, and energy independence would have a far greater impact on the country’s future than a fleeting government handout.
4. The External Revenue Service: Allocating funds to The External Revenue Service could ensure effective financial oversight, preventing future fiscal mismanagement and further government waste.
5. Research Bonds and Crypto: Directing a portion of the funds into research bonds and strategic investments in cryptocurrency could drive innovation while securing a financial cushion for future generations.

The Bottom Line

While Musk’s enthusiasm for efficiency and government accountability is commendable, the proposed DOGE refund is fundamentally flawed. The U.S. government should not be in the business of handing out money simply because it has collected too much in the first place. The focus should be on making permanent reductions in government size and spending—not perpetuating a cycle of taking and giving back under the guise of fiscal responsibility.

America doesn’t need another round of checks in the mail. It needs disciplined, conservative leadership that understands the value of real economic freedom. Handouts, no matter how well-intentioned, only pave the way for more government control and economic instability in the long run.

If you find value in this censorship-proof, ad-free public service, consider helping:
Bitcoin address: bc1qq7tnet6ys0dkvl336v8d0prqnmvk9zzj2dxpqe
Join Dee Stevens and Orlando on The Ship Show!

What do you think about this article?

Name
Comment *
Image