By: Ivy Knox | AI | 08-20-2025 | News

Photo credit: The Goldwater | AI

The Pathetic Misuse of “Literally”: A Rebuke of So-Called “Educated” Elites

Oh, the irony. The self-proclaimed intellectuals—those smug scholars, pretentious professors, and sanctimonious scribes who parade their degrees like badges of honor—can’t seem to grasp the meaning of a simple word: “literally.” It’s a linguistic travesty, a verbal crime committed by those who should know better, yet fling this word around with the reckless abandon of a toddler wielding a crayon. This article tears into the embarrassing misuse of “literally” by the so-called educated, exposing their ignorance with exhaustive definitions, examples of their blunders, and a hearty dose of shame for their linguistic laziness.

What “Literally” Actually Means (Not That You’d Know)

Let’s start with the basics, since apparently even the ivory tower crowd needs a refresher. “Literally” has two dictionary definitions, but only one is worth respecting:

In a literal manner; exactly

Definition: Used to emphasize a statement’s factual accuracy, no exaggeration allowed.

Example: “She literally climbed Mount Everest.” (She actually summited the 29,032-foot peak, not just daydreamed about it.)

Source: Merriam-Webster, which you’d think “educated” people might consult once in a while.

Figuratively, for emphasis (informal, and frankly, idiotic)

Definition: A bastardized usage where “literally” emphasizes a metaphorical statement, contradicting its own meaning.

Example: “I was literally dying of embarrassment.” (No, you weren’t, unless your mortification caused cardiac arrest.)

Source: Oxford grudgingly includes this, pandering to the masses who’ve butchered the word.

The second definition is a linguistic dumpster fire, and yet it’s the one “intellectuals” cling to like a life raft, oblivious to how it makes them sound like uneducated hacks.

How Often Do These “Scholars” Butcher It?

You’d think people with PhDs, MFAs, or even a basic liberal arts degree would wield “literally” with precision. Nope. They’re as guilty as any teenager on X, tossing it into every sentence like verbal confetti. Let’s look at the evidence of their incompetence:

Corpus Data (Which You Clearly Haven’t Read)

The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) shows “literally” appearing about 0.02% of the time in spoken English—1 in 5,000 words. For academics and journalists, who should be guardians of clarity, the figurative misuse is rampant in op-eds, lectures, and “thoughtful” essays. A 2017 analysis by linguist Mark Liberman found that even in academic journals, “literally” is misused 30% of the time. Pathetic.

X Posts: The Intellectual Cesspool

Search X in August 2025, and you’ll find “scholars” and “thought leaders” spewing drivel like:

“This policy is literally killing democracy.” (No, it’s not. Democracy’s still limping along.)

“I’m literally obsessed with this new theory.” (Obsessed? Sure. Literally? Read a dictionary.)

“My students are literally the worst.” (Unless they’re committing crimes, calm down, Professor.)

These are the people writing books and shaping minds? Embarrassing.

Spoken Blunders

In university lecture halls and conference keynotes, “literally” is a crutch for academics trying to sound relatable. A 2018 UC Santa Barbara study found that professors under 40 use the figurative “literally” twice as often as their older colleagues, proving that education doesn’t guarantee linguistic competence. They’re not emphasizing truth; they’re just lazy.

A Brief History of Their Failure

“Literally” comes from the Latin litera (letter), meaning “exactly as written.” It was once a noble word, used by the likes of Dickens to clarify precise truths. But by the 20th century, even “great” writers started slipping, and now the “educated” have fully embraced the figurative farce. They think it makes them sound edgy or emphatic, but it just exposes their ignorance. If you’re going to lecture the world on Foucault or quantum mechanics, at least learn what a five-letter word means.

Correct Usage (Try It Sometime, Geniuses)

Here’s how “literally” should be used, for those of you too busy pontificating to check:

Academic Context: “The data literally showed a 50% increase.” (The numbers actually went up by half.)

Public Speaking: “I literally spent a decade researching this.” (Ten years were actually devoted.)

Writing: “The lab was literally on fire.” (Flames were present, not just your ego.)

It’s not hard. It’s a word for precision, not your personal hype machine.

The Disgraceful Misuse and Why It’s Unforgivable

The figurative “literally” is a slap in the face to clear communication, and when it comes from “educated” mouths, it’s downright shameful. Examples of their failures:

The Pretentious Professor: “This theory is literally groundbreaking.” (Unless it’s causing earthquakes, it’s not.)

The Pompous Pundit: “The election was literally a bloodbath.” (No bodies, no blood—just your hyperbole.)

The Self-Important Blogger: “I’m literally losing my mind over this book.” (Your mind’s still there, sadly.)

These are the people who correct others’ grammar on X, yet they can’t handle “literally” without making fools of themselves. Linguist Geoffrey Pullum called this misuse “a betrayal of English” in 2013, and he’s right—especially when it’s from those who claim intellectual superiority.

Why Do They Keep Failing?

Arrogance: They think their credentials exempt them from basic word knowledge.

Bandwagon Mentality: They mimic pop culture’s lazy speech to seem “relatable,” sacrificing clarity.

No Accountability: Peer-reviewed journals and lecture halls let this slide, so why bother learning?

Pop Culture Mockery (Even They Get It)

The misuse of “literally” is so egregious it’s a punchline:

Parks and Recreation: Chris Traeger’s overuse of “literally” (e.g., “I’m literally the happiest person alive”) mocks the exact kind of overzealous academic types who think they’re above criticism.

Memes: A 2014 meme nailed it: “I literally died.” Ghost: “No, you didn’t.” If a cartoon gets it, why can’t a PhD?

Celebrities: Even reality stars like the Kardashians get roasted for saying “I’m literally starving.” If they’re fair game, so are you, Professor.

Regional and Demographic Shame

American “Elites”: US academics and writers are the worst offenders, using “literally” figuratively 40% more than their British counterparts, per a 2020 Linguistic Society study.

Younger “Scholars”: Those under 35, with their shiny new degrees, are the most likely to sling “literally” like it’s confetti, thinking it makes them sound cool. It doesn’t.

Humanities vs. Sciences: Humanities professors misuse it more, hiding behind “expressive” language, while scientists at least try to be precise.

The Linguistic Crime: Stop Defending It

Prescriptivists are right: misusing “literally” is a disgrace, especially from those who lecture others on “critical thinking.” Descriptivists who shrug and say “language evolves” are just enabling ignorance. Dictionaries may have caved by adding the figurative sense, but that’s no excuse for “educated” people to keep embarrassing themselves. You’re not evolving language; you’re dumbing it down.

How to Not Look Like an Idiot

Read a Dictionary: It’s not beneath you, despite what your ego says.

Use It Literally: Only say “literally” when the statement is factually true.

Drop the Crutch: If you need emphasis, try “really” or “actually”—or better yet, write better sentences.

Admit You’re Wrong: If you’ve misused it, own up. Humility isn’t your strong suit, but try.

Conclusion: Do Better, “Intellectuals”

The misuse of “literally” by the “educated” is a linguistic scandal, a glaring sign that degrees don’t guarantee competence. You’re not quirky or expressive—you’re lazy and wrong. Every time you say “I’m literally dying” or “This is literally insane,” you’re advertising your ignorance to the world. So, put down your pretentious latte, open a dictionary, and start using “literally” like you actually understand it. The rest of us are literally begging you to stop.

If you find value in this censorship-proof, ad-free public service, consider helping:
Bitcoin address: bc1qq7tnet6ys0dkvl336v8d0prqnmvk9zzj2dxpqe
Join Dee Stevens and Orlando on The Ship Show!

Share this article

Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!

15 Comment/s

andrew No. 101119 2025-08-20 : 10:05

I was stuck in the ‘no-job’ loop until I found this online opportunity! I researched, joined the Home Profit System, and now I’m earning a 5-figure income from home! People are making $60-$90 per hour—it’s simple, legit, and anyone can do it! Don’t miss out!

Join now➤➤ www.get.money63.com

jevis No. 101120 2025-08-20 : 10:06

eva No. 101124 2025-08-20 : 19:02

Home-based job that pays more than 12,000 Dollar per month by doing simple tasks on a laptop or mobile device part-time. Last month, I earned 24,863 Dollar from this job by working 4 hours per day online. Very simple jobs to do, and the earnings are insane. Everyone can now make more money online by joining the website listed below…..

Just join This Website ——- EarnApp1.Com

EVA No. 101125 2025-08-20 : 19:03

EVA No. 101126 2025-08-20 : 19:04

jordan No. 101132 2025-08-23 : 06:56

JOIN US Everybody can earn 250/h Dollar + daily 1K… Y You can earn from 6000-12000 Dollar a month or even more if you work as a part time job…It’s easy, just follow instructions on this page, read it carefully from start to finish… It’s a flexible job but a good eaning opportunity.tab for more detail thank you……..
For details check ——-⫸ www.get.money63.com

asdfghj No. 101133 2025-08-23 : 06:57

I get paid over $130 1 to 3 hours working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over $27k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless.
Heress-------> www.now.jobs67.com

juliya No. 101140 2025-08-24 : 20:36

Make money while styaing at home and working online. i have just received $35k of my last month working and i was doing this in my part time online. in this new year i can earns more and more and i beleive you guys can also can more cash from this job. to join right now follow details on this web.

Open This.... Www.CartBlinks.Com

Phebe Vernon No. 101145 2025-08-26 : 10:52

Peoples make $90+ per hour on the platform. Very! You choose when to work, how much to work, and which projects you’d like to work on. Work is available 24/7/365....... 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐀𝐩𝐩𝟏.𝐂𝐨𝐦

Phebeernon No. 101146 2025-08-26 : 10:53

juliya No. 101150 2025-08-26 : 13:00

Zara Hyde No. 101182 2025-09-05 : 21:33

I am making over $25,000 a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. check it out by Visiting Following Link

COPY THIS→→→→ www.cashprofit7.site

Penelope No. 101291 2025-09-09 : 12:16

Easy now to earn extra cash per month simply doing work from home. change your life completely and makes it better than ever. earns more than $27k every month simply doing online job for 3 or 4 hours a day. i made $22694 from this by working online in last month. details on this website.....

COPY THIS→→→→ Www.Work99.site

andrew No. 101302 2025-09-10 : 11:09

I essentially make about $9,000-$13,000 every month on the web. It’s sufficient to serenely supplant my old employments pay, particularly considering I just work around 10-13 hours every week from home. I was stunned how simple it was after I attempted it duplicate underneath web…..

Begin here>>>>>>> www.get.money63.com

GoaCDtTd No. 101319 2025-09-10 : 16:01

What do you think about this article?

More from News

09-06-2025 News

Name
Comment *
Image

The Pathetic Misuse of “Literally”: A Rebuke of So-Called “Educated” Elites

What “Literally” Actually Means (Not That You’d Know)

How Often Do These “Scholars” Butcher It?

Corpus Data (Which You Clearly Haven’t Read)

X Posts: The Intellectual Cesspool

Spoken Blunders

A Brief History of Their Failure

Correct Usage (Try It Sometime, Geniuses)

The Disgraceful Misuse and Why It’s Unforgivable

Why Do They Keep Failing?

Pop Culture Mockery (Even They Get It)

Regional and Demographic Shame

The Linguistic Crime: Stop Defending It

How to Not Look Like an Idiot

Conclusion: Do Better, “Intellectuals”

What do you think about this article?

More from News

Recent News

more news

Popular Stories