By: Red Pill | 06-27-2018 | News
Photo credit: Axios

SCOTUS Ruling on Travel Ban Reinforces Trump's Commitment to Protect Americans

President Trump was greeted with yet another major victory today after the Supreme Court Of The United States of America ruled the “travel ban” put forth by the Administration is Constitutional.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Nations affected by the SCOTUS victory. Credit: <a href=""> CBS. </a></span>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN. Wow!</p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="">June 26, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

The Supreme Court Of The United States of America (SCOTUS) today handed a major victory to the Trump Administration, and for the American people.

Many pundits have chimed in on what this means for the President moving forward, and again reminding Americans that the Supreme Court Justice nominations are crucial to the future of our nation, and thankfully President Trump placed Neil Gorsuch on the bench.

If we're fortunate, President Trump will be able to replace a liberal Justice in his second term.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="">@JudgeNap</a> on SCOTUS Upholding Travel Ban: &#39;Ringing, Uncompromising&#39; Win for <a href="">@realDonaldTrump</a> <a href="">@AmericaNewsroom</a> <a href=""></a> <a href=""></a></p>&mdash; FoxNewsInsider (@FoxNewsInsider) <a href="">June 26, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

By a vote of 5-4, the justices rejected the challenges to President Donald Trump’s September 2017 order, which is most often referred to as the “travel ban,” that begins with restricting immigration to the United States by citizens of eight dangerous countries.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote his opinion in favor as the majority relied on the credible national security justifications for their decision.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">VICTORY: The Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold President Trump&#39;s travel ban. <br><br>Thank you to every single person who voted for Trump, so we could pick up that SCOTUS seat! <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TravelBan</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TuesdayThoughts</a></p>&mdash; #ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) <a href="">June 26, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

"The sole prerequisite," Justice Roberts wrote, is "that the entry of the covered aliens 'would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.' The President has undoubtedly fulfilled that requirement here."

The case matter before SCOTUS said:

<blockquote>”The order under scrutiny at the court was the most recent of three orders issued by the president since he took office in 2017. The first order, issued on January 27, 2017, imposed a 90-day ban on the entry into the United States of citizens from seven overwhelmingly Muslim countries – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen – and put a 120-day hold on the admission of refugees, although it contained an exception for refugees who were religious minorities in their home countries.”</blockquote>

Justice Roberts underscored that President Trump had ordered a detailed evaluation of every country's compliance with the risk assessment baseline and then issued his ban based solely upon those findings.

"Based on that review, he found that restricting entry of aliens who could not be vetted with adequate information was in the national interest," Justice Roberts wrote.

“Plaintiffs allege that the primary purpose of the [travel ban] was religious animus and that the president’s stated concerns about vetting protocols and national security were but pretexts for discriminating against Muslims,” Justice Roberts writes. “At the heart of their case is a series of statements by the president and his advisers both during the campaign and since the president assumed office. The issue, however, is not whether to denounce the president’s statements, but the significance of those statements in reviewing a Presidential directive, neutral on its face, addressing a matter within the core of executive responsibility."

Since the Conservative SCOTUS Justices tend to make rational decisions, one could only expect the radical leftist Justice Sonia Sotomayor to have argued on dissent.

Sotomayor blasted the decision, arguing that the court had “blindly” endorsed “a discriminatory policy,” which clearly isn't true.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions praised the ruling, saying that it was "critical to ensuring the continued authority of President Trump, and all future Presidents, to protect the American people."

The fact of the matter remains, in nations which allow the flood of Muslims into their country from Somalia, Venezuela, North Korea, Iran, Libya, Syria, and Yemen all see major increases in crimes committed per their own statistics, such as that of Germany, who saw a<a href=""> 30.5% increase </a>once “refugees” were allowed into their nations.

Americans don't want this in their country. We've seen far too many incidents of radicals from these nations commit attacks across the globe and even in America.

President Trump campaigned on <i>”Making America Safe Again,”</i> and promised he would <i>”Make America Great Again,”</i> and that's exactly what he's done by ensuring that Americans are placed first and foremost above all threats from abroad.

The White House firmly maintains that the ban targets individuals from countries that have failed to provide enough information to allow for proper vetting of prospective travelers. President Trump also says it is needed on matters of national security.

Even the loss of one American life is too many, and we've seen countless deaths at the hands of so-called “migrants” and “refugees” from many of these nations.

Today's victory is one that President Trump can tout as per laying the groundwork for the next six years at minimal, as his popularity soars in response to hardline policies against the threats of radical Islamists from around the globe.

Additional Sources or Relevant Information:

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

~<b>Send Me An E-Mail!</b>

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<b><i>Follow Me On Twitter!</i></b>

<a href="">@IWillRedPillU</a>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><i>Be Sure To Share Our Articles!</i></span>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><b>The Goldwater</b></span>

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
1 Comment/s
joe No. 29832 2018-06-27 : 03:36

look its no a muslim ban what it is is a ban on possable terriorests! its not potus fault that it happends to be the majority of the terrorists are muslims! i havent seen any moderate or other wise muslims condemning the radical side of its muslim culture! its 🐂💩! if the muslims here in america were against radicals theyd stand up but their not! their 🐔💩's! afraid of their own people why do you tbink they fled to america? they knew we would fight against it! muslims r the ones yell "down with america"! muslims stand up or go home!

What do you think about this article?
Comment *

Recent News

Popular Stories