The more we witness the reality series that is the Democratic Party the further the plot seems to thicken.
Now it seems as if the laptop that Representative Debbie Wasserman-Schultz has been battling against prosecutors over may have been intentionally left behind by the now charged Imran Awan in order to secure the existence of his family and a future for the Muslim Brotherhood he is connected heavily to.
Not only did Imran Awan potentially take the laptop belonging to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and leave it behind but he may have left a letter to the U.S. Attorney, since he was originally planning to flee the United States of America before he was apprehended.
Yes the memorable occurrence made national news when <a href="http://www.thegoldwater.com/news/5637-Imran-Awan-Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-s-IT-Tech-Arrested-Trying-To-Flee-US">Imran Awan was stopped when trying to take flight.</a>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If what I'm hearing is even half true, Awan brothers are Obama admin approved CIA assets. Is Brennan next to flee country? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DNCisCollapsing?src=hash">#DNCisCollapsing</a>💥</p>— JohnWickofPolitics (@Gingrich_of_PA) <a href="https://twitter.com/Gingrich_of_PA/status/890012263624699906">July 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The United States Capitol Police stated that they first recovered the missing laptop inside of an old phone booth in the Rayburn House Office Building, where it was sitting out in the open with the letter to the United States Attorney.
Investigators also say that beside the laptop was a Pakistani ID card, several copies of Awan’s driver’s license, and a Congressional ID badge. Federal authorities say there was also a handwritten composition notebook marked “attorney-client privilege” but have yet to announce what may have been inside.
Imran Awan may have Knocked Over the Dominoes to Topple Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
Unironically even after Debbie Wasserman Schultz has tried to repeatedly deny the laptop found was hers, the username on the device was listed as “RepDWS” a surefire sign that the computer was indeed the property of the Florida Democrat and former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman.
Back in February Imran Awan was formerly banned from accessing the congressional computer network because was under a FBI cyber security investigation where he was considered a suspect.
Even after knowing that Imran Awan was being hounded with the Federal Bureau of Investigation on his trail, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s office still gave him access to House facilities since she continued to employ him.
Everyone is asking, what information does Imran Awan have that could incriminate Debbie Wasserman Schultz in order for her to have continued to have paid him after he was under investigation?
What ties does the <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/5651-Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-May-Have-Given-Muslim-Brotherhood-Top-Secret-Information">Democratic Party have to the Muslim Brotherhood</a> as per their connection?
Why was Debbie Wasserman Schultz covering for a criminal who was a threat to the security of the United States of America?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sec of State gave an ultra expedited visa to the Awan bros. <a href="https://t.co/eitT2E7Yll">https://t.co/eitT2E7Yll</a></p>— Charles Hayes (@hazenoff) <a href="https://twitter.com/hazenoff/status/890031506118377473">July 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The location of where the now infamous laptop was found, which was on the second floor of the Rayburn building, is a place Awan would have had no reason or even clearance to go.
Wasserman Schultz’s office is located in the Longworth building, which she was the only remaining member of Congress to have still used his services since the test who once employed him had fired him after the FBI investigation began.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rJ1aJhN6PoE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Everyone and their mothers have likely now seen the unforgettable televised Congressional hearing on the Capitol Police Budget where Debbie Wasserman Schultz attempts to threaten “consequences” if Chief Matthew Verderosa refused to handover her laptop. “If a member loses equipment, it should be given back,” she said.
Verderosa went on to explain to her that laptop couldn’t be returned because it was tied to a criminal suspect and part of an ongoing investigation.
Wasserman Schultz furiously stated that when though Awan was a suspect, the computer should be returned to “the owner” because it is “a member’s, if the member is not under investigation.”
Of course around two months later Debbie Wasserman Schultz changed her story claiming it was Awan’s laptop, which had been purchased with taxpayer funds from her office and that she had never even seen it.
It could be that she knew her own family was actually overseeing the Imran Awan case that <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/5697-Steven-Wasserman-Brother-of-Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-Overseeing-Awan-Imran-Case">was sure to grant her some form of protection.</a>
She said she only sought to protect Awan’s rights. “This was not my laptop,” she said August 3. “I have never seen that laptop. I don’t know what’s on the laptop.”
Or course after Imran Awan <a href="https://www.thegoldwater.com/news/6817-Imran-Awan-Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-s-IT-Tech-Indicted-Today-Convenient-Terror-Distraction">was indicted by a federal grand jury</a> the scenario quickly turned to fear for the Democratic Party and Wasserman Schultz.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">two felons slick dick & IT dnc thief <a href="https://t.co/vB6Qxsz9Ye">pic.twitter.com/vB6Qxsz9Ye</a></p>— Blessed (@brrider) <a href="https://twitter.com/brrider/status/890013302192881664">July 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Awan alongside his wife Hina Alvi, as well as two of his Pakistani brothers who are believed to be tied to the Muslim Brotherhood continue to remain at the center of a Federal Bureau of Investigation cybersecurity criminal investigation which could potentially implicate or involve in some fashion other Democratic House members.
It is believed that Imran Awan's <a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/7675-Wife-of-Imran-Awan-Cuts-Deal-With-Feds-Deep-State-Woes">wife has actually cut a deal</a> with the Feds.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Salary Data for Abid A. Awan, one of the other Pakistani IT workers linked to criminal investigation <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AwanBrothers?src=hash">#AwanBrothers</a> <a href="https://t.co/iR0v4bbrUK">https://t.co/iR0v4bbrUK</a> <a href="https://t.co/fj1jDMQF9k">pic.twitter.com/fj1jDMQF9k</a></p>— Nick Short 🇺🇸 (@PoliticalShort) <a href="https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/890071378896068609">July 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The crucial questions remain unanswered such as what exactly is Debbie Wasserman Schultz trying to hide and what does Imran Awan mean to the Federal Bureau of Investigation during their own criminal sleuthing?
Texas Republican Representative Louie Gohmert, whose career has been as a prosecutor, and also a member of the House Judiciary Committee said that it seems unlikely Imran Awan simply left the laptop in a forgetful nature.
“Imran Awan is a calculating person who made great efforts to cover his tracks, both electronically and physically,” Gohmert said.
“Placing that laptop with his personal documents, which may well incriminate him, those he worked for, or both, in the dead of night in a House office building, was a deliberate act by a cunning suspect, and it needs to be investigated,” he concluded.
Officially the laptop was to be used only by the IT aide who worked for numerous members, but Wasserman Schultz, who has sometimes claimed ownership was later changing her story, has now hired an outside counsel, William Pittard, to make the argument that the laptop has no reason to be examined.
Pittard recently argued that the speech and debate clause, which is a stipulation only in order to protects a member’s information directly related to their legislative duties, should somehow prevent prosecutors from examining the laptop’s contents.
Pittard is a well known attorney who has been a longstanding partner with Kaiser Dillon who was also the former acting general counsel of the House.
By essentially hiring an outside counsel to make the ignorant argument that the speech and debate clause on behalf of Wasserman Schultz is somehow defacto in this case, it literally makes the Democratic Party and Debbie Wasserman Schultz appear to be even more likely to be covering up potential crimes
Historically, members of Congress who hire an outside attorney doesn't end well for those who are paying the lawyer.
In 2009 Louisiana Representative William Jefferson, was actually convicted for “using his office to try to enrich himself and relatives through a web of bribes and payoffs involving business ventures in Africa.”
In that same scenario he had hired an outside counsel, but investigators later found $100,000 in cold hard cash in his freezer.
The documents alone found inside the Rayburn building tied the laptop directly 5o Awan and ensured that any law enforcement agency would keep possession of the computer for future criminal evidence.
The reporting officer who found the laptop actually wrote that when he saw Awan’s name, he remembered protecting an interrogation of him a few months earlier.
Clearly the FBI have been hot on the trail of Awan for quite some time, outside of the media eye.
The “attorney client privilege” has also prevented police from immediately reviewing some of the papers found on the device.
However that officer who wrote the reported actually opened the MacBook which was discovered and realized that the login screen didn't have some random user information and it did not have Awan’s username, but instead “RepDWS.”
The official police report stated the following:
<blockquote>On 4/6/2017 at 0021 hours, with the building closed to the public, AOC informed USCP Rayburn offices of an unattended bag in the phone booth on the 2nd floor. The officer received the open-contents visible bag and prepared a found property report. While reviewing the inventory of the bag contents, the officer found:</blockquote>
<blockquote>#1 a Pakistani ID card with the name Mohommed Ashraf Awan. </blockquote>
<blockquote>#2 a copy – not original – of a drivers license with name Imran Awan. </blockquote>
<blockquote>#3 a copy (front and back) of his Congressional ID. </blockquote>
<blockquote>#4 an Apple laptop with the homescreen initials ‘RepDWS’.</blockquote>
<blockquote>#5 composition notebooks with notes handwritten saying ‘attorney client privilege’ and possibly discussing case details below.</blockquote>
<blockquote>#6 loose letters addressed to US Attorney of DC discussing the apparent owner of the bag being investigated.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Approximately 3-4 months ago officer was requested by SAA as police presence of 4 individuals being interviewed, including the bag owner. It is unknown to the officer whether he is still employed.</blockquote>
What remains to be seen is what comes next. It's certainly intriguing to watch the progress.
It now seems as if Imran Awan may have intentionally left behind evidence that would take down Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who could possibly take down Hillary Clinton, who in turn would turn state's evidence on Barack Obama.
Of course that's a theory, but it's very possible.
Reminder that when the Federal Bureau of Investigation has historically targeted the Italian Mafia (the Democratic Party is much more powerful than the Italian Mafia) it can take months if not years to finally take down the Godfather, but the dominos do fall into place.
The Democratic Party and the Deep State Globalists which finance them are clearly in panic mode, for evidence of that just view the other articles The Goldwater has put out on this case, and read the paid shills who are absolutely terrified with disinformation in the comments below.
—<i>[email protected]</i>
<i>On Twitter:</i>
<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillYou">@IWillRedPillYou</a>
Tips? Info? Send me a message!
I guess "using your office to enrich yourself or family" is only a crime when "bribes and payoffs" are involved?? Otherwise wouldn't almost every politician end up in jail?