As if you needed any further confirmation that the likes of “Big Tech,” Google’s YouTube, Dorsey at Twitter, Spez at Reddit, or Zuckerberg at Facebook had a bias that supported the voters for Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic Party - there is now confirmation from an Obama official that the behemoth platform in social media worked on behalf of Obama.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">An article written in 2012 about a project code named tärgus <a href="https://t.co/cuwy4MhkPm">https://t.co/cuwy4MhkPm</a></p>— Carol Davidsen (@cld276) <a href="https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975564499297226752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<a href="https://ijr.com/2018/03/1077083-ex-obama-campaign-director-fb/">The Independent Journal Review </a>first reported on a series of tweets made this past Sunday by former Director of Integration and Media Analytics for Obama for America, Carol Davidsen, in which she claimed the 2012 Obama Campaign for Re-election worked side by side with Facebook to “suck out the whole social graph,” and benefit Barack Obama during the election.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">An example of how we used that data to append to our email lists. <a href="https://t.co/VHhSukvXDY">pic.twitter.com/VHhSukvXDY</a></p>— Carol Davidsen (@cld276) <a href="https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975565844632821760?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">They came to office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side.</p>— Carol Davidsen (@cld276) <a href="https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975568208886484997?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn’t stop us once they realized that was what we were doing,” Davidsen said, inferring that Facebook supported Obama enough to essentially interfere in the Democratic Elections of our Constitutional Republic.
“They came to office in the days following election recruiting & were very candid that they allowed us to do things they wouldn’t have allowed someone else to do because they were on our side,” Davidsen sent in a tweet.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I start talking about Facebook at around minute 18, and had more to say, before getting dragged off stage because i didn’t understand the clock in the back of the room. Ha <a href="https://t.co/GhytQzghX5">https://t.co/GhytQzghX5</a></p>— Carol Davidsen (@cld276) <a href="https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975576363112509440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
“I worked on all of the data integration projects at OFA. This was the only one that felt creepy, even though we played by the rules, and didn’t do anything I felt was ugly, with the data,” Davidsen bragged.
Despite her opinion that she “didn't do anything ugly with the data,” the fact of the matter is this means that Facebook gave Barack Obama an unfair advantage in the election.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I was right about what keeps me up at night being about price discrimination. That is where all of the true potential ugliness comes out in an algorithm based world that allows micro targeting.</p>— Carol Davidsen (@cld276) <a href="https://twitter.com/cld276/status/975582232575344640?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This is an admission more so than anything else that Facebook works on behalf of the Democratic Party, which is exactly why social media must be regulated if we're to continue to have free and open elections.
Ironic, since Facebook is also actively working to censor Conservative media outlets and independent journalists who support the President of the United States of America and the Republican Party.
In fact,<a href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/former-obama-official-admits-facebook-allowed-obama-campaign-mine-data-side/"> The Gateway Pundit </a>wrote on the following on Monday:
<blockquote>”Top conservative Facebook pages with daily traffic in the millions have seen 75% to 95% drop in traffic."</blockquote>
<blockquote>"Young Cons, Western Journalism, SarahPalin.com, Independent Journal Review, Right Wing News, and several others have seen a dramatic loss in traffic.”</blockquote>
The Gateway Pundit is absolutely correct here, and thousands if not millions of Trump supporters have personally experienced the censorship on Facebook.
For example, if you were to join a “pro-Trump” Facebook group, or a series of them, and then share posts from any of the above named conservative leaning websites, as well as several others, after you've shared to a few groups you'll receive a temporary ban from posting into any groups on the platform.
This ban isn't from the group moderators, all of whom support President Trump, this is coming directly from Facebook via an anti-Conservative, anti-Trump algorithm written and put into place to limit the reach of Trump supporters and Republicans in general.
The goal behind this is that Zuckerberg’s minions feel as if they can limit the interaction amongst Trump supporters, and simultaneously limit the reach or audience potential of those users, they'll be incapable of defending themselves against the mainstream media's lies and propaganda.
If they can silence the truth from the non-corporate mainstream sites, it affects public opinion, thus increasing their chances of winning future elections.
They never expected Donald John Trump to win the Presidency. When he did, they were both in shock and furious. Now, they're trying to control the information flow to ensure it doesn't happen again.
It's as if we're living in an Orwellian society, straight out of the pages of “1984,” in a modern Communist oppression that's ruled by the elites. Outright insanity.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Internet Bill of Rights - Petitioning the White House<br>Please Sign The Petition & Share to Your Friends/Family<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/GOP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@GOP</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/InternetBillOfRights?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#InternetBillOfRights</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WeThePeople?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WeThePeople</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PEAK2018?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PEAK2018</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WhiteHouse?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WhiteHouse</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FreedomOfSpeech?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FreedomOfSpeech</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FirstAmendment?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FirstAmendment</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WhiteHouse?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WhiteHouse</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MAGA?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MAGA</a><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/QAnon?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#QAnon</a><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%24PART&src=ctag&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">$PART</a><a href="https://t.co/NzfoMKUBX2">https://t.co/NzfoMKUBX2</a></p>— Red Pill (@IWillRedPillU) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillU/status/975816825563959298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
America needs an Internet Bill of Rights. It's the only way to ensure that all candidates, all people, regardless of political affiliation, have a fair and unbiased chance to win an election.
Right now, it's becoming more clear than ever before, that “big tech” is an extension of the Democratic Party, which is why it<a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/19782-Right-CENSORED-by-Big-Tech-Why-We-Must-Defeat-Them"> censors Conservatives.</a>
Additional Sources:
https://ijr.com/2018/03/1077083-ex-obama-campaign-director-fb/
<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>
—<i>[email protected]</i>
<i>Follow Me On Twitter:</i>
<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillU">@IWillRedPillU</a>
We used Social Media to conduct our initial employment background Investigations.
Just looking over published comments, works, and activities of applicants saved us from hiring social/sexual fetish odd balls,
NDA violators and explosive personalities. Plus I can't begin to tell you how many times resumes fell apart just comparing it to their Social Media Rants and Raves.
Stop and think how much traceable PERSONAL, SOCIAL and FAMILY DATA you place on Facebroke ☺ or run thru Google everyday.
An remember the US Government does not need a Warrant to purchase PUBLICLY posted Data.
So if you aren't using anonymizer tools, MAC / IP Changer, HTTPS, TOR, $1o loaded cash paid cheap burner flip phones, the world knows you better than you want.
BTW: Never have had a FB, MySpace, etc… acct. in my real name.
Their security chief just resigned his position, says he's still working at facebook. Zuck lost $6b in one day. No biggie.