Our history teacher told us that by supporting @pewdiepie, we are supporting anti-Semitism, racism, ignorance, etc. He also said that @WSJ is a very reputable news source. How ignorant can you get? The political arguments are more and more ironic daily. @ChrisRayGun @benshapiro pic.twitter.com/qg6BtrOhek
— Rissian (@Rissian9) December 15, 2018
RT if you're against everything this dumbass teacher is saying. https://t.co/VpevlwVgAu
— ƿ૯ωძɿ૯ƿɿ૯ (@pewdiepie) December 18, 2018
Teacher tells his students they can get sued for retweeting @pewdiepie pic.twitter.com/zA7LoKaG0A
— I,Hypocrite (@lporiginalg) December 18, 2018
*enjoys anime review once* pic.twitter.com/bOAAQSH9WO
— ƿ૯ωძɿ૯ƿɿ૯ (@pewdiepie) December 15, 2018
Imagine being blamed for "extremist radicalization" because some guy runs past you in a video game.
— ƿ૯ωძɿ૯ƿɿ૯ (@pewdiepie) December 15, 2018
(This is the journalist of that article) pic.twitter.com/1rf2N8Vqvh
Teacher yells at students for liking PewDiePie. Says liking or retweeting him is racist, anti Semitic and supports genocide. Also tells kids they could be arrested or sued for it. from r/PublicFreakout
— Simon Fridman (@fridman_simon) December 18, 2018
NOBODY is trying to take away your right to freedom of speech. That is an alt right falsehood.
— Dr. Madeline Seers (@MadelineSeers13) December 19, 2018
We are just trying to make certain things you say illegal if they hurt other people’s feelings.
There’s a literal, actual difference.
Source: https://twitter.com/Rissian9/status/1073844634420277248?s=19
Twitter: #PewDiePie #YouTube @Rissian9 @pewdiepie
THEIVES AND LIARS USING YOUR VIDEOS TO GENERATE MONEY FOR THE GLOBAL CABAL!!!! BC WHAT HAPPENS TO THE MONEY YOU LOSE AND THEY CLAIM. EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!! BIGGEST FUCKING SCAM SINCE YOU CAN KEEP YOUR DOCTOR!!!!!! AND THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS SERIOUSLY HUGE ASS SCAM TO GENERATE MONEY FOR THE GLOBALISTS CAUSE THEY HAVE HAD MANY REVENUES CUT OFF RECENTLY!!!!
YOUTUBE IS A MAFIA MEMBER OF THE GLOBALIST MAFIA CABAL!!! JUST LIKE ALL THE REST ARE... GOOGLE/FACEBOOK/YOUTUBE/AND WHOEVER ELSE APPLIES...
MONEYMONGERING POWER HUNGRY MANIPULATING LYING THEIVES ALL GUILTY OF THE RICO LAWS. THEY ARE AN ORGANIZED COLLUDING MOB GENERATING MONEY THROUGH VICTIMIZATION OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC. RICO LAWS ARE FOR MAFIA MOBS AND THATS WHAT THIS IS.
OH YEAH HOW COULD I HAVE FORGOT TWITTER? ADD TWITTER TO THE LIST!!!
The article is factually incorrect in that it states, rather casually, that "Even if he were [promoting racism], he'd be within his legal rights to do so in the United States of America, if he were a US citizen." That is untrue. The protections of the US Constitution extend to all persons standing on US soil. The Constitution does not differentiate between "US citizen" and any other legal status, or no legal status at all. If you are on US soil, the US Constitution protects you, too. I really object to these casual mis-statements of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, this represents an intellectual laziness and legal distortion that is both inappropriate and dangerous.
The is the famous case of a transit visitor that was "detained" in between airplanes at New York JFK airport. the passenger came from abroad and was headed for Canada. US Immigration "detained" him. ON a hearing brought on a writ of habeas corpus, US ICE attempted to argue before a Federal Judge that, since the passenger had not passed through customs inspection, he was not legally inside the USA, and thus the protections of the COnstitution did not apply to him. The Judge asked: "Whose flag flies over that airport?" The US attorney replied: "Why, the US flag, Your Honor" And the Judge asked: "And whose policemen guard that airport?" "Why, American policemen, Your Honor." Judge: "You have the American Flag and American armed guards, then that is American soil, and the detainee is entitled to the protections of the United States Constitution same as everybody else. " And the traveler was released that instant.
Try to focus on that. The Constitution protects everyone, not some "citizen" sub-group.
Never heard of him....
But I have a 90+/- % NON online Life. Unlike too many in todays electronic age, I deal with REAL People face to face and use my cell phone to make phone calls,
With that said, Jokes are Jokes and it depends on the audience whether it is accepted or not. Which is the problem with telling any joke to 1+ million people at the same time. Because a Jester will always have a significant overly vocal part of that 1+ Million that is ticked off or takes it personally. eg. Dumb blonde jokes, jokes about wives and etc. Tell a joke about animals and PETA has a fit.
So the audience is the deciding factor in all cases .... pick it well before engaging mouth.