The “Big Tech” maggot known as Jack Dorsey has seemingly confessed to outright censorship of Americans on his Saudi-controlled Twitter platform. This comes as the unpopularity of the liberal dominant social media is surging after Dorsey admits to censoring 600,000 accounts “unfairly.”
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/w_hb-a7BKPU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Jack Dorsey continues to frustrate the masses, at near-levels of Mark Zuckerberg at this point, in the sense that the general public on both sides of the political spectrum does not trust Twitter's development and service teams.
<i>The left feels as if Twitter allows too many Nazis on the platform, and the right feels as if they're being targeted unfairly for shadowbans, muting, suspensions, or outright permanently banning them.</i>
The truth is that Twitter is not only silencing upwards of an estimated two million accounts through shadowbans and suspension, but they overwhelmingly target Trump supporters.
As per the claims of liberals about so-called “Nazis?” They've now made that word utterly useless as an adjective because they'd rather despise anyone who supports Trump and uses the word against even the most moderate of Conservatives.
This is the current political climate creates a hostile relationship between the two parties, with supporters of the Democratic Party and supporters of President Trump at war with one another and little hope for unity in the near future.
Due to that war, there is s desire to see “scalps” taken, especially among those under the anarcho-communist, progressive, liberal, and leftist ideologies; as the controversial founder of Infowars, Alex Jones, was recently banned.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ub6h1JGHDyU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Leftists are celebrating these assaults on Freedom of Speech, which is unsurprising.
They seem not to care at all, and in fact, one day? It could be one of their own who ends up being targeted, as part of an effort to silence those who speak outside of the narrative.
We've seen an <i>historic<i> trampling of <i>our<i> Freedom of Speech, and it truly achieved an event horizon over the last week.
What happened in the last week to Alex Jones should terrify you, as an American citizen, whether you love or hate him.
Why?
You could be the next person targeted.
<iframe width="600" height="337" src="https://www.real.video/embed/5832272911001" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
So, it makes little sense to applaud this kind of censorship and overreach.
A majority of Republicans say that technology firms support the views of Liberals over that of Conservatives.
Those same Americans, according to<a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/27/americans-complicated-feelings-about-social-media-in-an-era-of-privacy-concerns/"> Pew Research</a>, say that social media platforms censor political viewpoints.
<img src="https://media.8ch.net/file_store/079735d667f8fef65b96ba7d85a083181327f3d9e7bc7c44f771f938e602d4c7.jpg" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">
<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">A stunning 86% Of Americans between 18-29 use social media, another reason we need an internet bill of rights. Credit: <a href="http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/27/americans-complicated-feelings-about-social-media-in-an-era-of-privacy-concerns/"> Pew Research</a>.</span>
They do, regardless if people want to admit it.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gjLCIDwn2jw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Still, Americans tend to feel that these firms benefit them and – to a lesser degree – society.
It exists within our nation a certain sense of freedom, an unalienable right towards our hearts desires, called <i>the pursuit of happiness.</i>
As patriotic Americans in every state are watching the fallout, they can only help to ask when and where our Constitutional Right to speak freely was rendered useless, with a heavy-handed, deeply destructive, and primarily coordinated ban of Alex Jones.
Alex Jones was removed from Google’s YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Spotify, and even Apple.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Smia7Lkbmgo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
We've known this was coming, and for those who swallowed the “red pill” many years ago?
We have all warned others of the impending censorship that would come from an overreach of power such as that which exists inside of Silicon Valley, aka “Big Tech,” including us at The Goldwater, just last year.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3RNqY5Nhr0k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
A majority of Republicans say technology firms support the views of liberals over conservatives and that social media platforms censor political viewpoints. Still, Americans tend to feel that these firms benefit them and – to a lesser degree – society.
We're taught that the general public is supposed to be granted equality, and simultaneously they can see that they're losing the very freedoms and rights our forefathers fought to protect.
In every waking moment of the day, you're reminded that big brother isn't far, and the likes of Google’s YouTube, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit, have found uniquely clever ways of imposing their authority in daily lives of Americans.
Dopamine is released into a person's brain whenever a person receives alike, or even a comment on social media, for example.
This is a system of rewarding; whereas all humans have a natural desire to be liked or garnish approval from their peers, we seek to achieve this.
It quickly becomes addictive, and over time? Americans tend to find themselves spending more time on their phones, computers, and other devices than they do in nature.
I always suggest that we already live in a virtual reality simulation, the only issue as of now is that we still have and express our emotions.
This is how social media has learned to control us, similarly to how a narcotic would grasp control over the people of this country.
In the 2016 elections, Americans had watched their rights dwindle since 2001, and wanted revenge against the establishment.
The horrific demographics shift as a result of illegal aliens violating our nation's immigration laws, and the corruption in DC, among criminal politicians who seemingly avoid charges for their crimes; created an atmosphere which led towards the perfect temperament.
We saw voter turnout like never before seen, or imagined, as the silent majority had said “enough is enough,” and voted for Donald Trump.
That clearly wasn't enough to change the narrative, though, and more opposition grew among the left than ever before.
The media, television, film, music, authors and journalists alike; the one thing everyone in entertainment has had in common in nearly two years is that the White House hasn't received an inch of respect.
There's a new battle that's already underway in America and has already won in many places across the globe.
It's one which threatens to trample upon the rights of hundreds of millions of people, censoring their posts on social media websites.
Those posts, all of which are controlled by mega-corporations, are now censored by the monolithic companies in what's known as "big tech."
For the first year of the Trump Presidency, it began with a shutdown of video streams, social media accounts, and various other messages delivered by what was labeled as being the "far right," and business-as-usual continued as this occurred.
The GOP, the Republican Party sat by idling in neutral as the censorship spread.
Soon enough, everyday Libertarians, Conservatives, Classical Liberals, Christians, Catholics, reformist Muslims, Jewish voices, the New Right, and every other aspect of "Trump Supporting" brands were being censored all across the internet.
The five types of politics under the party of Trump: reactionary, moderate, radical, extreme and new were all silenced.
Channels on YouTube were either losing their ad-revenue or completely shut down, even the most innocent of news streams were being labeled and targeted.
YouTube has been brutal in affecting those who would make a living through independent media.
By cutting their ad revenue, many Conservatives who had a large reach simply vanished.
Google knows that YouTube is the most powerful video platform on the internet, no need to remind them.
Ironically, YouTube remains the easiest platform for websites to embed, as you see here in this story.
Google, in general, seems to be targeting pro-Trump news, even causing a response from the 45th President of the United States of America, Donald Trump.
The Goldwater recently published<a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/35420-Trump-Blasts-Google-Search-Suppression-of-Trump-News-Proof-The-President-Is-Correct"> solid proof with examples of Google's skewed Google Search </a>results, which cannot be denied.
So, the overreach of their bias, when enforced, can be quite devastating to the GOP, and right-wing media in general.
Which also brings us to Facebook, who itself banned Alex Jones, and as The Goldwater recently showed our readers?
<a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/34670-Facebook-s-Secret-Ranks-for-Users-Exposed-in-Invasive-User-Score-Scandal">Facebook has a secret “ranking” system to score users</a>, which is eerily similar to the Communist Party of China's methods in ranking citizens.
Each social media user on Facebook is secretly “ranked,” to determine whether or not that person is considered “trustworthy” in the eyes of Facebook’s development team and engineers, using a scale of zero to ten as a “score” that further analyzes your behaviors taken on their platform.
Facebook has even been<a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/8469-Since-Mark-Zuckerberg-Sold-Ads-to-Russia-to-Influence-US-Election-Doesn-t-That-Make-Him-A-Criminal"> caught selling advertising to the Russian government</a>.
This should give the President ammunition, knowing that<a href="https://thegoldwater.com/news/35624-Trump-s-Fight-of-Social-Media-on-Censorship-Emboldens-as-100-Zuckerberg-Employees-Speak-Out"> 100 Facebook employees recently turned on Mark Zuckerberg</a>, and in their efforts, made headlines.
The outright lies spewed by both Mark Zuckerberg, and this week, Jack Dorsey, were in part criminal.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KzybjaXT2oE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
If you are testifying in front of Congress, there are two key statutes governing perjury you need to be aware of: United States Code sections 1621 and 1001 of Title 18.
There's<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1621"> “18 U.S. Code § 1621 - Perjury Generally,”</a>which covers general perjury, obviously, and stipulates that anyone who "willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true" is guilty of perjury.
For those crimes, they “shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both.”
Then, there exists<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1021"> “18 U.S. Code § 1021 Lying to Government Agents,” </a>which covers false statements more generally, without requiring an oath.
The section stipulates that "whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States, knowingly and willfully" falsifies or conceals information, including before a Congressional Committee's inquiry, may also be fined or imprisoned up to five years.
Section 1001 is what General Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos have in common; as each was targeted on these allegations during the historic witch hunt.
Did you know that it is a crime to tell a lie to the federal government? Even if your lie is oral and not under oath? Even if you have received no warnings of any kind?
Even if you are not trying to cheat the government out of money? Even if the government is not misled by your falsehood? Well, it is.
That's what Jack Dorsey did. He lied. He sat there and said that Twitter doesn't engage in censorship or punishments based upon political ideology.
That's a godforsaken lie.
We've all seen the Project Veritas footage.
We've all seen Jack Dorsey lie on national television.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/lhd2ilAD5wg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
So, again, why does the statement as of last year from Jack Dorsey contradict the testimony before Congress?
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qx87wbKRdWo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Worse than <i>anything else,</i> is the fact that the GOP doesn't seem to understand the history about Project Veritas, or what Twitter is doing.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The deplatforming of your supporters online is way more important Mr. President. Do something.</p>— Virginia Dare (@vdare) <a href="https://twitter.com/vdare/status/1037847313841045511?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Even President Trump has yet to issue a comment about Alex Jones, who helped elect him.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/64gTjdUrDFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
In each of these videos from Project Veritas, Twitter's political, or ideological-based censorship is blatantly clear.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rgyPpsX2B0g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
What is the point in wasting taxpayer dollars at all, GOP?
Not to mention, Twitter claimed in August that Alex Jones had not violated any rules.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7uEEUQx28nQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
If you're not going to study the questions, understand the tech, as well as the process of “shadowbanning” and “suspending” user accounts when this was your one chance to get it right for the base?
You have to be joking? Was the ignorance intentional? These are the people running our government? Seriously?
There has never been less respect from me towards the GOP than after watching that hearing.
To top it off, moments before the hearings, Alex Jones denied all of the allegations against him, in an unexpected rant on Capitol Hill to CNBC.
<div style="width:100%;text-align:center;margin:0 auto;"><iframe width="360" height="202" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SKRENe2k4JM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
Barack Obama, before leaving office, quietly signed into law the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
The NDAA has inside of it a hidden secret, introduced by John McCain.
The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act," which allows for the platforms of “Big Tech” to essentially get away with their efforts of silencing us.
Why?
They have dirt on the intelligence community, sharing information on terrorists and other alleged threats to the CIA, including American citizens.
It also gives the US government the ability to imprison us all without reason if they choose to do so, but that's a debate for another time.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Obama?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Obama</a> signed <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Songbird?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Songbird</a> McCain's, 2017 National Defense Authorization Act before leaving office-<br><br>Hidden in budget?<br><br>"Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act"<br><br>It was SUPPOSED to be used against Foreigners-<br><br>Wrong- <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DeepState?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DeepState</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BigTech?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BigTech</a> is using it on us-<br><br>Conservatives~ <a href="https://t.co/ZczNYhM9gH">pic.twitter.com/ZczNYhM9gH</a></p>— @IWillRedPillU ❌ (@IWillRedPillU) <a href="https://twitter.com/IWillRedPillU/status/1038433089633050626?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<strong><span style="color:red;">FREE ALEX JONES! WE ARE ALL ALEX JONES!</span></strong>
Additional Sources or Relevant Information:
Contact your elected officials. Demand an #InternetBillOfRights and push the hashtag.
<a href="https://www.house.gov/Representatives">Click here to find your elected officials in the House of Representatives.</a>
<a href="https://www.senate.gov/reference/common/faq/How_to_correspond_senators.htm">Click here to find your elected officials in the United States Senate.</a>
<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>
~<b>Send Me An E-Mail!</b>
—<i>[email protected]</i>
<b><i>Follow Me On Twitter!</i></b>
<a href="https://www.twitter.com/IWillRedPillU">@IWillRedPillU</a>
<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><i>Be Sure To Share Our Articles!</i></span>
<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><b>The Goldwater</b></span>
Alex Jones needs his rights