By: Red Pill | 08-29-2018 | News
Photo credit: Social Rush

Trump Blasts Google Search Suppression of “Trump News” - Proof The President Is Correct

||| Social Rush |||

The 45th President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump, has aimed his targets at the “Big Tech” giants of the ultra-globalist policy-endorsing company Google, for their skewering of results in a search for “Trump News,” and their suppression of Conservative-leaning news, and independent media outlets, of which are scarce to be seen via Google’s search results.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Google search results for “Trump News” shows only the viewing/reporting of Fake News Media. In other words, they have it RIGGED, for me &amp; others, so that almost all stories &amp; news is BAD. Fake CNN is prominent. Republican/Conservative &amp; Fair Media is shut out. Illegal? 96% of….</p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="">August 28, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">….results on “Trump News” are from National Left-Wing Media, very dangerous. Google &amp; others are suppressing voices of Conservatives and hiding information and news that is good. They are controlling what we can &amp; cannot see. This is a very serious situation-will be addressed!</p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="">August 28, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

With the known bias of the heavily leftist platforms of Google and all of the social media, the President is correct in his assertion of these claims of a bias and slanted ability to find results.

Many media websites are not found in Google’s search results, of which Conservatives in America, Christians, Jews, and most traditional values or right-leaning people across the globe get their news from today, such as that of right here at The Goldwater; or Big League Politics, the Daily Caller, Breitbart, The Gateway Pundit, and one of several other news websites we would consider to be allies within our support of President Trump, and for the most part, see eye-to-eye on policy and presentation of a perspective,

This fact can be seen in several instances or examples, and we're going to test the President of the United States of America's claim, to show you he is correct.

We took the phrase “Trump Supporters,” and entered it into a Google Search, and the results were indeed the majority negative coverage, with almost non-existent examples of the known pro-Trump news outlets mentioned above through independent media sources even showing up.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">The results in a Google Search for “Trump supporters” came back showing next to no pro-Trump independent media outlets, but had no problem showing results from anti-Trump outlets. Credit: <a href=""> Google Search results.</a></span>

Now, we know without a shadow of a doubt that most of the results I took a screenshot of when searching for “Trump supporters” came back as being negative, and there were literally no pro-Trump independent media outlets shown in these results.

Let's look at some of those results, starting with the first.

Here's an article from San Francisco Gate titled,<a href=""> “Sacha Baron Cohen brought his show to SF to teach Trump supporters how to 'smell like a liberal,'” </a>which is essentially a means of mocking Trump's supporters, trying to depict them as ignorant or unintelligent.

There's a Washington Post article titled,<a href=""> ”Republicans’ anger at McCain speaks volumes about America’s tribal politics,” </a>which suggests that if you dislike John McCain, it can't possibly be over the fact he broadcast an aired statement of apology at the demands of Communists via the Vietcong captors, or the “wet start” allegations, or the claims he gave up strategic coordinates of US forces that cost them their lives, or the differing body masses between him and other POWs not from a prominent family, or the outright fact he tried to undercut President Trump's agenda so much so that he actually hurt America in the process.

Remember, in <a href=""> McCain's book he told Trump supporters to “Go To Hell,” </a>but WaPo doesn't care about McCain's book, just using him to attack us further, despite the history of racism used by McCain himself against countless people.

No, WaPo, it couldn't possibly be any of those things, right? Instead to the propagandists of WaPo, it's a “tribal” issue, subverting the <i>legitimate anger</i> at McCain and replacing it with prehistoric sentiment used by WaPo argue we're “all just ignorant Trump supporters,” which is why we hate the media in the first place.

All of these and many more are what I found just in a Google Search for “Trump Supporters” via Google’s search engine results.

How anyone can deny that President Trump is wrong is beyond me.

This is actually a fact and it's common. For example, the large social media platforms such as Facebook have in recent years been exposed for silencing major pro-Trump outlets, including us at The Goldwater, which we covered in full detail in a recent article titled,<a href=""> “Facebook’s Secret Ranks for Users Exposed in Invasive User Score Scandal,” </a>which also exposed the Communist-Chinese style of a “ranking and scoring system” that Facebook would use to suppress the voices of each and every one of their over 2 billion users.

“As of the second quarter of 2018, Facebook had 2.23 billion monthly active users. In the third quarter of 2012, the number of active Facebook users had surpassed one billion, making it the first social network ever to do so. Active users are those which have logged in to Facebook during the last 30 days,” Facebook says of their enormous reach.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Facebook’s Secret Ranks for Users EXPOSED in Invasive User Score Scandal<br><br>How many times has Mark Zuckerberg been caught lying now?<a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WalkAway</a> from <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Facebook</a>&#39;s Bias-<a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BigTech</a> is out of control at this point.<a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GreatAwakening</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MAGA</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#KAG</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RedPill</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RealNews</a><a href=""></a></p>&mdash; @IWillRedPillU (@IWillRedPillU) <a href="">August 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

Facebook is mentioned here because they too are engaging in this type of censorship, and during our tests and trials of each of these <a href=""> dangerous “Big Tech” </a>companies are literally able to influence the hearts and minds of billions, albeit especially the voters of the United States of America, where the internet, and these platforms, are as common in homes as toilets, several times over with mobile phones, tablets, smart TVs, and computers utilizing them on a daily basis, multiple times..

So, when the same “Big Tech” companies are silencing the positive reporting of the Trump Administration, you know that the majority of Americans are being misled by the type of content they're exposed to, although, whether or not they believe or are influenced by such outlandish anti-Trump propaganda is an entirely different debate, as we all know and understand.

There is a sort of “Great Awakening” occurring in this great nation, where the good people of these United States of America have begun to realize en masse, by the millions, that the “news’ from the mainstream media isn't actual news, but heavily biased propaganda, and sure, it exists on both sides of the aisle.

However, much news isn't reported by the mainstream that's in favor of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States of America, and I oftentimes find myself reading a horrifying lack of respect for the Oval Office in which President Trump is now the Commander-in-Chief, and there is the largest of the problem with the mainstream media, who have invested so much into trying to destroy this President that they've disrespected the world's highest and most powerful office on several occasions, and to many Americans, that is an unforgivable attack.

Google, by manipulating their results to intentionally highlight these types of “news” articles and the outlets in media which show this anti-American sentiment are exactly why the President calls them the “Enemy Of The People,” and you'll find, as well as to the surprise of the companies affected and offended by this label, the American people agree.

Another aspect of this censorship effort is that the mainstream media or “chosen” media outlets which are shown via Google Search results, tend to ignore very important news that Americans want to know about.

We can prove this with a few examples as well.

For starters, President Trump continues to tell the people via Twitter he and those he knows are targeted via a “Witch Hunt,” and that the real controversial crimes of Hillary Rodham Clinton and even Barack Hussein Obama are ignored. While we, as Trump supporters, fully agree? The truth is that the US monumental evidence that the media doesn't just ignore these allegations, but they refuse to report important details of a news story, using selective editing to ignore what it is they don't want the public to know to implicate specific figures.

Let's begin to prove this by discussing the NXIVM pedophile cult, which is a heavily liberal group, comprised of Allison Mack, Kathy Russell, Lauren Salzman and Nancy, and was led by the “cult leader” Keith Raniere.

If you look back in 2007, an article by Charles Hunt of The New York Post titled,<a href=""> “HILLARY'S $30,000 FANS ARE HER ‘CULT’ FOLLOWING,” </a>reported that the Clintons, both William Jefferson Clinton, also known as former President Bill Clinton, and Hillary Rodham Clinton, a two-time failed Presidential candidate, both have connections to the cult through their top members, and their heavy donations to the Clintons and Democratic Party are simply indisputable.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit: <a href=""> The New York Post.</a></span>

<blockquote>Hillary isn’t the only Clinton NXIVM officials are attracted to.</blockquote>

<blockquote>At least three of the – group President Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman sisters – are members of Bill’s charitable organization, the Clinton Global Initiative. Membership is by invitation only and requires at least a $15,000 donation per person for one year.</blockquote>

That final sentence in the New York Post article mentions Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman family as being members of the Clinton Global Initiative, so remember this as we progress.

As The Goldwater reports, in an extremely descriptive piece, titled,<a href=""> “Seagram's Heiress Clare Bronfman Used Fortune to Finance Democrats Pedo Sex Cult Island,” </a>Clare Bronfman, heir to the Seagram's fortune, is one of several members of the NXIVM pedophile sex cult who is in trial, and as one of their many elite financial support tools, she literally bought a private island, and a plane to fly to the island, in her time assisting the cult with its perverse child rapes, enslavement of women, as well as its “branding” of women with hot irons, where Raniere, their leader, would burn his initials into the flesh of the women who “served” him and the other Hollywood elites in the cult.

<strong><span style="color:blue;"><a href=""> This fact was not only announced by US Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of New York, which says “Keith Raniere, Clare Bronfman, Allison Mack, Kathy Russell, Lauren Salzman and Nancy Salzman with racketeering conspiracy involving an array of crimes, including identity theft, extortion, forced labor, sex trafficking, money laundering, wire fraud and obstruction of justice,” but by clicking anywhere in this paragraph, you can be redirected directly to the Department of Justice website to see the press release yourself.</a></span></strong>

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">NXIVM Press Release. Credit: <a href=""> DOJ </a></span>

Now, I beg to question the public as to which of the mainstream media's television “news” networks have reported what I've shown you above, about the NXIVM pedophile sex cult, or their membership, who are already indicted, having any ties to the Democratic Party, or the Clinton Global Initiative, Bill and Hillary Clinton's charity?

You won't find this coverage on CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, NBC News, or CBS News, and you definitely won't see it on the supposedly “Conservative” network of Fox News; which of course means you're not going to see it pushed via Google.

Using the Google Search engine, I tried to search for the sentence, “Hillary and Bill Clinton connected to NXIVM,” just to see what showed up.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit: <a href=""> Google Search results.</a></span>

The New York Post story showing the original report of this connection is nowhere to be found, nor are any of our articles at The Goldwater, which has had millions of people read it, so there is no excuse for it to not show up, when Google claims indexing is determined by traffic towards a story.

In fact, the top results are all of the <i>biased fact checkers</i>, trying to discredit the claim, which we've already provided you with the evidence of its origins, long before anyone ever knew the NXIVM pedophile sex cult was a criminal enterprise or it would face charges at all.

The Goldwater reported an article titled, <a href=""> “Hillary Clinton And Dem Tied To Sex-Trafficking Cult Which Enslaved And Tortured Women,”</a> and it doesn't appear in the Google Search results.

Big League Politics reported an article titled,<a href=""> “Inside The Clinton-Connected Sex Cult,”</a> and it doesn't appear in the Google Search results.

The Hal Turner Radio Show reported an article titled,<a href=""> “FBI RAIDS HOME OF CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE MEMBER IN SEX TRAFFICKING SEARCH,”</a> and it doesn't appear in the Google Search results.

Big League Politics reported an article titled, <a href=""> “Hillary Clinton Donor Clare Bronfman Arrested In NXIVM Sex Cult Case,”</a> and it doesn't appear in the Google Search results.

The Goldwater reported an article titled,<a href=""> “Justice in Schneiderman Case? NXIVM, Clinton Foundation Cover-Ups Require a Federal Investigation,”</a> and it doesn't appear in the Google Search results.

Now, I'm sure there are several other strong names in independent media that had similar stories, but I know based on our traffic aline and the shares of these stories I've seen on social media platforms these were huge in terms of their viewership and reach.

<b>When President Trump says Google is censoring the news, he is surely correct.</b>

There's a chance President Trump doesn't even know the extent of how coordinated it is since it seems it's being done on a massive scale.

The powers that be at Google are working in unison with the dying, dinosaur, propagandist mainstream media to try and shut down these truths from being seen, and they're even utilizing President Trump's “fake news,” phrase to do so.

Google, similar to Facebook, has tried to label media outlets as being “fake news,” when they push a truth that doesn't meet the official narrative, <i>and that's terrifying,</i> which makes our media not much different from the alleged state-run media of Russia, Iran, or North Korea.

It's also why the mainstream media is standing with Google against the oddly well-written privacy laws in California, that was even more so oddly signed into law by the infamously dangerous Governor Jerry Brown.

There's an old saying, “Even a broken clock is right twice a day,” and it seems the newest legislation on privacy to be signed by California Governor Jerry Brown against “Big Tech” companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and many others have stirred the pot of infighting amongst Democrats over the new law.

The law began as a rushed piece of legislation, which was originally written as the set of guidelines to protect the privacy of users on the internet, a great thing in the age of monolithic spying.

Most Americans have no idea that a process is known as “data mining” is used to harvest information about them on various websites and platforms, and then that information is sold to the highest bidder. Whether it be for marketing or research purposes. It does happen, and there isn't a website in the world which doesn't use this to their advantage.

The sale and harvesting a data, however, is a violation of the privacy and rights of the everyday user of the internet.

There's always stipulations and terms of services for various online websites or platforms, whether it be a Google platform such as YouTube, the notoriously liberal Jack Dorsey-founded platform of Twitter, or even the extremely biased Mark Zuckerberg led platform, which caused Congressional hearings as a result, Facebook; but how many people read those terms of service?

Chances are, not many.

If you did, you'd see what was happening with much of your data and information that's provided to the platform.

Since most do not take the time to research what it is they're approving a company to do with their data, it's a clever means of companies avoiding their users from becoming frustrated or angry with what they're doing to turn a profit.

That being said, California has taken additional steps to protect users from this type of activity, by signing the recently passed California Consumer Privacy Act, which was signed by Democratic Governor Jerry Brown.

For most of our readers, they hear the name Jerry Brown, and they instantly assume anything he's in favor of is “bad,” which for the most part is true.

The Governor of California is a radicalized Marxist, an anti-Trump liberal sycophant, who tends to push a Communist agenda under the guise of “progressive” values.

This law protects consumers. So I'm a bit shocked to say I support the rights of the American people to be protected, and I agree with the battle against “Big Tech,“ because privacy is so important.

Here's the catch, though, which is that any big governance is usually a bad move. Most Conservatives would agree with this statement.

So then why, is the mainstream media attempting to back Google with this? Well, they're threatened by us.

The top-rated primetime shows on cable “news” have an average of 1 to 3 million viewers, and articles on The Goldwater, or other independent media outlets similar to us, can surpass a million reads with ease, and we're giving the public the unfiltered truth in the process.

A whole lot of redpilling is occurring in independent journalism, to say the least, while being blunt, and that's a serious threat to the establishment.

Agreeing with what I've said here,<a href=""> Light On reports </a>that, “Search engine and advertising monolith Google continued to press its offensive against alternative media this week with an announcement unveiling a new $300 million project called the Google News Initiative.”

“The initiative encompasses a range of new projects announced by the tech giant, which has long been accused of enjoying a monopoly position and of siphoning off digital advertising revenue from traditional news publishers,” the Light On author says. “Google sees it differently, however, and asserted in a press statement announcing the initiative that it “paid $12.6 billion to partners” while driving “10 billion clicks a month to publishers’ websites for free.” The company is now promising to continue working ‘with publishers to elevate accurate, quality content and stem the flow of misinformation and disinformation.’”

That's actually correct, because <a href=""> Google released a statement confirming the efforts, </a>in a blog post labeled, “The Google News Initiative: Building a stronger future for news,” that implies there will be an intentional impact on what you find via their platform.

Of course, if you're watching mainstream media, you'll hear a different argument.

Notoriously liberal media outlet, and the original “fake news” network itself,<a href=""> CNN reports, “Trump slams Google search as 'rigged' — but it's not,” </a>which shows you just how connected the mainstream media is to Google.

As a journalist, I want the truth, and then I want to report that truth. Of course, it's going to be better if the truth supports my ideas, but the truth is the truth and I cannot change this because facts don't change based on your feelings.

CNN, by suggesting the Google Search results are “not” rigged, are implying they have somehow had Google hand over their top-secret algorithms and code, and had that scanned and reviewed by the world's most brilliant independent and unbiased programmers, and they did all of this since President Trump's statement this morning on Twitter.

This is one, impossible to do in a day, likely not even a month, and two, how the hell would CNN know? Google would never give them access to their code or algorithms. Idiots.

So what you can take from this is that CNN is lying to even more ignorant people than their reporter and editor who wrote the article.

“President Donald Trump has renewed his claims of bias against conservatives on the internet, accusing Google of rigging its results to show "bad" stories when users search for “Trump news,” CNN said.

Hey CNN? Scroll up. I've proven it.

Intrusion from the government tends to become manipulative or fail in most cases, and that's because government works at a snail's pace to implement the proper changes necessary to fine-tune anything.

The counter offer from the liberal tech companies doesn't seem to be any better.

The Vice President of State Government Affairs for the Internet Association, Robert Callahan, argued that the bill in California itself didn't seem to gain enough review before its passage.

“Data regulation policy is complex and impacts every sector of the economy, including the internet industry. That makes the lack of public discussion and process surrounding this far-reaching bill even more concerning,” Callahan said of the new bill. “It is critical going forward that policymakers work to correct the inevitable, negative policy and compliance ramifications this last-minute deal will create for California’s consumers and businesses alike.”

That could be a problem, sure, but the fact that “Big Tech” is angry about the bill is somewhat pleasing on the surface.

When companies like Google’s YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter have engaged in some of the worst political censorship in the history of the nation by silencing or punishing Conservative voices, one can help but laugh when they're upset about a new law.

They're certainly not getting any support from Trump supporters or the millions of people who have been subject to their biased policies.

Google spokeswoman Katherine Williams argued at the time, “that the bill itself is vague,” and could have “implications” for a variety of industries which rely upon a tech-heavy world in 2018.

“While today's law marks some improvements to an overly vague and broad ballot measure, it came together under extreme time pressure, and imposes sweeping novel obligations on thousands of large and small businesses around the world, across every industry,” Williams said. “We appreciate that California legislators recognize these issues and we look forward to improvements to address the many unintended consequences of the law.”

This is a fair argument, and not necessarily one you'd expect the globalist-backing Google to suggest: there's a chance this regulation affects small businesses in other categories.

Again, regulations are always unnecessary, but so is the censorship from online behemoths like Google, <i>so I'm not sure they're the best candidates to speak about this.</i>

Whereas the new law will force all companies to show their users exactly what they're doing with their online information, this much is a good thing.

It will also require those companies to tell their users exactly which third-parties are sold or given access to that information. We all like transparency, so this is also a positive.

We know what is really going on though, and why Google, and the mainstream media, are united in shutting down independent media journalists, as well as social media through shadowbans or other forms of censorship; and that is because they are scared to death of what we may report.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit: <a href=""> The New York Post.</a></span>

Some of our stories are more powerful in terms of reach than Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS News, ABC News, or NBC News; and I'm certain some of the other Conservative media outlets similar as us can claim the same about their traffic on some stories.

The mainstream media wants to pretend these facts don't exist, and that's terrifying. Why would you keep the details of this from being reported, and why are these horrible people being protected?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">DOJ Arrests 2,300 Child Sexual Predators in Operation Broken Heart<a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PedoGate</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PedoGateNews</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#KAG</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TuesdayThoughts</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Sessions</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ICAC</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SaveTheChildren</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DOJ</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MAGA</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PatriotsFight</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#QResearch</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WarriorsParade</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NintendoE3</a><a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Pulse</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TrumpKimSummit</a><a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#LockThemAllUp</a> <a href=";ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#News</a><a href=""></a></p>&mdash; @IWillRedPillU (@IWillRedPillU) <a href="">June 12, 2018</a></blockquote>

<script async src="" charset="utf-8"></script>

In June, <i>The Goldwater</i> broke a story that at the time, the mainstream media wasn't covering, titled,<a href=""> “DOJ Arrests 2,300 Child Sexual Predators in Operation Broken Heart,” </a>but we tagged the mainstream media on Twitter, and Facebook, with over a thousand retweets and likes tagging them, demanding them to report it.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit:<a href=""> DOJ Arrests 2,300 Child Sexual Predators in Operation Broken Heart via The Goldwater.</a></span>

Yes, 2,300 pedophiles, men, and women who engage in the forced sexual assault, molestation, rape, distributions of child pornography, production of child pornography, or any other sex crimes against children.

It was reported directly from the Department of Justice website, in a press release.

<img src="" style="max-height:640bpx;max-width:360px;">

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;">Credit: <a href=""> DOJ.</a></span>

The mainstream media succumbed to all of the pressure from the public on social media and they published a handful of articles about it, but to date, I've never seen a single television news broadcast via the mainstream networks about it, and nobody has demanded to ask for more coverage or as to why this happened.

Folks, 2,3000 pedophiles in a single operation is huge.

“The task forces identified 195 offenders who either produced child pornography or committed child sexual abuse, and 383 children who suffered recent, ongoing, or historical sexual abuse or production of child pornography,” the DOJ writes.

Wow, 383 child victims and no tv news coverage?

There's a total of 61 ICAC task forces, which are spread across all 50 US states and territories, who spend 24-hours a day locating both the victims of online child sexual abuse, those who have distributed and solicited child pornography, as well as those who engage in efforts to seduce children over the internet.

The ICAC task forces are also “comprised of more than 4,500 federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies,” as reported by the DOJ.

Should this not be worldwide news all hours of the day and night? It wasn't.

With Google, and their powerful search engine indexing and algorithms, all hiding this? It makes it likely most people don't know.

This makes Google dangerous, just as is the mainstream media the enemy of the people, so are those who attempt to hide the truth or manipulate the minds of the public.

Let's not forget, Google helps promote illegal aliens in our nation too. <a href=""> Google and Apple have aided illegal aliens with an application for their devices which assists illegal aliens in hiding from law enforcement.</a>

President Trump is right about Google.

This is why we support President Trump, and why he won in the first place.

How can you help? Stop using Google. It's really that simple.

Additional Sources or Relevant Information:

<strong><span style="color:red;">Tips? Info? Send me a message!</span></strong>

~<b>Send Me An E-Mail!</b>

—<i>[email protected]</i>

<b><i>Follow Me On Twitter!</i></b>

<a href="">@IWillRedPillU</a>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><i>Be Sure To Share Our Articles!</i></span>

<span style="margin-top:15px;rgba(42,51,6,0.7);font-size:12px;"><b>The Goldwater</b></span>

Share this article
Thoughts on the above story? Comment below!
1 Comment/s
Anonymous No. 35459 2018-08-29 : 10:42

I try to wake up at least one person every other day to the evils of the goog and nothing is free even if it looks so from the surface. It’s very easy when comparing the same search results between DuckDuckGo and goog. Another shot over the bow is asking them what they think about the gov collecting personal data. Most hate the idea, then I ask them why they don’t seem to care and even volunteer info to private companies like goog. I proceed to inform them that goog fartbook and Twitter didn’t get ultra rich selling cars… it’s your data! And this is even nicer for the gov as they can now purchase the same info! Good example is the dna info that was freely shared and used to catch the golden state killer. I am glad they caught the monster just not in the way it was done. One other positive about the GS killer story is a lot of normies got a wake up call about privacy and that a data loose family member can now inadvertently take down another family member by simply investigating their family tree. Or maybe once we are stuck with single payer healthcare system and more info on perceptibility for disease can be learned from dna maybe certain individuals will be let to expire instead of receiving treatment? Who knows? But I wouldn’t put it past them.

What do you think about this article?
Comment *

Recent News

Popular Stories